VARS-FL: Validation-Aligned Client Selection for Non-IID Federated Learning in IoT Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) systems typically employ stateless client selection, treating each communication round independently and ignoring accumulated evidence of client contribution quality. Under non-IID data, this leads to slow convergence and unstable training, particularly when selection relies on local proxies (e.g., training loss) that are misaligned with the global optimization objective. These challenges are especially pronounced in Internet of Things (IoT) and Industrial IoT (IIoT) environments, where data is highly heterogeneous and distributed across devices observing different traffic patterns. In this paper, we propose VARS-FL (Validation-Aligned Reputation Scoring for Federated Learning), a client selection framework that quantifies each client's contribution using the reduction in server-side validation loss induced by its update. These per-round signals are aggregated into a Reputation score that combines a sliding-window average of recent contributions with a logarithmically scaled participation term, enabling robust exploration-exploitation selection. VARS-FL requires no changes to local training or aggregation and remains fully compatible with standard FedAvg. We evaluate VARS-FL on a 15-class non-IID IoT intrusion detection task using the Edge-IIoTset dataset, with 100 clients across multiple seeds, and compare it against FedAvg, Oort, and Power-of-Choice. VARS-FL consistently improves accuracy, F1-Macro, and loss, while accelerating convergence (up to 36% fewer rounds to reach 80% accuracy). These results demonstrate that validation-aligned, history-aware client selection provides a more reliable and efficient training process for federated learning in heterogeneous IoT environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.
Builds on
23 of 45 references.
References · 23
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 762
- 2020Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopescited by 612
- 2021Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 537
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
- 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 347
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
11 more
- 2017Sparse Communication for Distributed Gradient Descentcited by 243
- 2023Heterogeneous Federated Learning: State-of-the-art and Research Challengescited by 160
- 2021FedScale: Benchmarking Model and System Performance of Federated Learning at Scalecited by 135
- 2018D"IoT: A Federated Self-learning Anomaly Detection System for IoTcited by 89
- 2018N-BaIoT: Network-based Detection of IoT Botnet Attacks Using Deep Autoencoderscited by 67
- 2019Active Federated Learningcited by 63
- 2022Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 62
- 2023Federated Learning for Computationally-Constrained Heterogeneous Devices: A Surveycited by 40
- 2021Federated Learning for Malware Detection in IoT Devicescited by 36
- 2024Green Federated Learning: A new era of Green Aware AIcited by 12
- 2025Federated Learning for Cyber Physical Systems: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.