mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Auto-weighted Robust Federated Learning with Corrupted Data Sources

arXiv 2101.05880 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning provides a communication-efficient and privacy-preserving training process by enabling learning statistical models with massive participants while keeping their data in local clients. However, standard federated learning techniques that naively minimize an average loss function are vulnerable to data corruptions from outliers, systematic mislabeling, or even adversaries. In addition, it is often prohibited for service providers to verify the quality of data samples due to the increasing concern of user data privacy. In this paper, we address this challenge by proposing Auto-weighted Robust Federated Learning (arfl), a novel approach that jointly learns the global model and the weights of local updates to provide robustness against corrupted data sources. We prove a learning bound on the expected risk with respect to the predictor and the weights of clients, which guides the definition of the objective for robust federated learning. The weights are allocated by comparing the empirical loss of a client with the average loss of the best p clients (p-average), thus we can downweight the clients with significantly high losses, thereby lower their contributions to the global model. We show that this approach achieves robustness when the data of corrupted clients is distributed differently from benign ones. To optimize the objective function, we propose a communication-efficient algorithm based on the blockwise minimization paradigm. We conduct experiments on multiple benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, FEMNIST and Shakespeare, considering different deep neural network models. The results show that our solution is robust against different scenarios including label shuffling, label flipping and noisy features, and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in most scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2021.

Builds on

35 of 66 references.

References · 35

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
  3. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  4. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
  5. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
  6. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
  7. 2020Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated Learningcited by 678
  8. 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 665
  9. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
  10. 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
  11. 2020Federated Learning with Matched Averagingcited by 564
  12. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 558
23 more
  1. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  2. 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 451
  3. 2019Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applicationscited by 409
  4. 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
  5. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
  6. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
  7. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
  8. 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 314
  9. 2018Parallel Restarted SGD with Faster Convergence and Less Communication: Demystifying Why Model Averaging Works for Deep Learningcited by 277
  10. 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 202
  11. 2020Threats to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 171
  12. 2019Federated Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 140
  13. 2018Rademacher Complexity for Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 132
  14. 2018Cooperative SGD: A unified Framework for the Design and Analysis of Communication-Efficient SGD Algorithmscited by 106
  15. 2020Byzantine-Resilient Secure Federated Learningcited by 93
  16. 2020Learning to Detect Malicious Clients for Robust Federated Learningcited by 86
  17. 2017Distributed Statistical Machine Learning in Adversarial Settings: Byzantine Gradient Descentcited by 59
  18. 2019Communication-Efficient Distributed Blockwise Momentum SGD with Error-Feedbackcited by 49
  19. 2020Training Speech Recognition Models with Federated Learning: A Quality/Cost Frameworkcited by 46
  20. 2019Federated Learning of N-gram Language Modelscited by 33
  21. 2019Real-World Image Datasets for Federated Learningcited by 30
  22. 2019Robust Learning from Untrusted Sourcescited by 27
  23. 2019Robust Federated Training via Collaborative Machine Teaching using Trusted Instancescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

12 papers.