mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

End-to-End Verifiable and Robust Federated Learning

arXiv 2609.15521 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning enables multiple parties to train a shared model without centralizing raw data with the help of an aggregator, but introduces integrity risks once participants or infrastructure are not fully trustworthy. Two requirements are particularly important: robustness to poisoned or Byzantine client updates, and verifiability of the aggregator so that clients or third parties can audit the reported aggregation without learning individual updates. Existing work has largely treated these goals separately, and efficient public verifiability for robust, outlier-excluding aggregation remains limited. We present a verifiable federated learning protocol that makes a robust aggregation pipeline publicly auditable. Our design combines cryptographic commitments with non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs to certify both (i) cosine-similarity-based outlier exclusion and (ii) aggregation over the selected set, without revealing individual client updates to verifiers. In experiments under representative poisoning attacks, our method maintains high accuracy, with an average accuracy loss below 4% across the evaluated configurations, while keeping verification overhead practical: proof artifacts can be generated and verified within minutes at the scale studied. In summary, our results show that robust outlier exclusion and public verifiability can be jointly achieved in a federated learning setting.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

17 of 65 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,653
  2. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 789
  3. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 708
  4. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 490
  5. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
  6. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 339
  7. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 287
  8. 2020Threats to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 178
  9. 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 160
  10. 2020Byzantine-Resilient Secure Federated Learningcited by 93
  11. 2022LoMar: A Local Defense Against Poisoning Attack on Federated Learningcited by 31
  12. 2021EIFFeL: Ensuring Integrity for Federated Learningcited by 28
5 more
  1. 2020An Accurate, Scalable and Verifiable Protocol for Federated Differentially Private Averagingcited by 20
  2. 2023Efficient Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated Machine Learningcited by 7
  3. 2025Toward Malicious Clients Detection in Federated Learningcited by 4
  4. 2019An Efficient Linkable Group Signature for Payer Tracing in Anonymous Cryptocurrenciescited by 1
  5. 2019zksk: A Library for Composable Zero-Knowledge Proofscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.