OPFL: Optimistic Verification of Federated Learning via Empirical Boundary
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning enables multiple clients to collaboratively train models without sharing their private data. However, the lack of visibility into local training makes it difficult to verify whether clients follow the prescribed training procedure or submit malicious updates, such as model poisoning. A natural approach is to replay client training for verification. However, privacy-preserving replay produces numerical results that cannot be directly matched with local client execution because the two run in different environments. We present OPFL, an optimistic verification framework for privacy-preserving federated learning. To protect data privacy, OPFL performs replay inside secure multi-party computation (MPC). Although gradients computed on MPC and local GPUs are not bitwise identical, we observe that their absolute differences are stable and bounded. OPFL therefore calibrates an empirical boundary offline and uses it to distinguish benign numerical deviations from malicious manipulation. To reduce the cost of expensive MPC replay, OPFL adopts optimistic verification by post auditing only sampled training steps. Experiments on LeNet, BERT, and Qwen show that the boundary generalizes across datasets, input lengths, and GPUs, while achieving 0% ASR against model poisoning and PGD-based attacks. On a LeNet workload, at p=0.01, OPFL is approximately 98.6× faster than full MPC-based FL and 625.5× faster than ZK-based approach.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
12 of 29 references.
References · 12
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2021Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practicecited by 84
- 2020Free-rider Attacks on Model Aggregation in Federated Learningcited by 57
- 2021EIFFeL: Ensuring Integrity for Federated Learningcited by 28
- 2021RoFL: Robustness of Secure Federated Learningcited by 25
- 2023Backdoor Federated Learning by Poisoning Backdoor-Critical Layerscited by 18
- 2024Optimistic Verifiable Training by Controlling Hardware Nondeterminismcited by 7
- 2023Secure and Verifiable Data Collaboration with Low-Cost Zero-Knowledge Proofscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.