mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Markets

arXiv 2206.02344 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2022cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of online learning in competitive settings in the context of two-sided matching markets. In particular, one side of the market, the agents, must learn about their preferences over the other side, the firms, through repeated interaction while competing with other agents for successful matches. We propose a class of decentralized, communication- and coordination-free algorithms that agents can use to reach to their stable match in structured matching markets. In contrast to prior works, the proposed algorithms make decisions based solely on an agent's own history of play and requires no foreknowledge of the firms' preferences. Our algorithms are constructed by splitting up the statistical problem of learning one's preferences, from noisy observations, from the problem of competing for firms. We show that under realistic structural assumptions on the underlying preferences of the agents and firms, the proposed algorithms incur a regret which grows at most logarithmically in the time horizon. Our results show that, in the case of matching markets, competition need not drastically affect the performance of decentralized, communication and coordination free online learning algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2022.

Builds on

13 of 40 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
  2. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 433
  3. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  4. 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 56
  5. 2019Social Learning in Multi Agent Multi Armed Banditscited by 48
  6. 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
  7. 2021Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedbackcited by 34
  8. 2019Improved Path-length Regret Bounds for Banditscited by 23
  9. 2018Multiplayer bandits without observing collision informationcited by 20
  10. 2016Matching while Learningcited by 19
  11. 2020Cooperative and Stochastic Multi-Player Multi-Armed Bandit: Optimal Regret With Neither Communication Nor Collisionscited by 13
  12. 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
1 more
  1. 2017Competing Bandits: Learning under Competitioncited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

11 papers.