mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MenuNet: A Strategy-Proof Mechanism for Matching Markets

arXiv 2605.03216 ↗First posted 4 May 2026cs.GT cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Strategy-proofness is a fundamental desideratum in mechanism design, ensuring truthful reporting and robust participation. Stability is another central requirement in matching markets, widely adopted in applications such as school choice and labor market clearing. In practice, however, these markets are invariably governed by complex distributional constraints, ranging from diversity quotas and regional balance to global capacity slacks, under which stable matchings often fail to exist. This raises a fundamental question: how to distribute unavoidable instability across agents while preserving strategy-proofness? To address this, we propose textttMenuNet, a strategy-proof mechanism design framework based on a neural representation of menus. Rather than directly constructing assignments, textttMenuNet learns to generate personalized probabilistic menus, from which assignments are realized via a structured sequential choice rule that guarantees strategy-proofness by construction. By decomposing stability into fairness (no envy) and non-wastefulness, our approach models these properties as vector-valued quantities and optimizes their distribution through differentiable objectives, providing a principled trade-off between competing axioms. Empirically, textttMenuNet navigates this trade-off effectively: it consistently outperforms Random Serial Dictatorship (RSD) in terms of envy and Deferred Acceptance (DA) in terms of waste, while maintaining scalability and computational efficiency. These results suggest that learning-based menu mechanisms provide a flexible and scalable paradigm for mechanism design in highly constrained, real-world environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

Builds on

10 of 33 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 54
  2. 2020Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Marketscited by 46
  3. 2017Optimal Auctions through Deep Learning: Advances in Differentiable Economicscited by 38
  4. 2020A Permutation-Equivariant Neural Network Architecture For Auction Designcited by 31
  5. 2022Optimal-er Auctions through Attentioncited by 26
  6. 2022A Context-Integrated Transformer-Based Neural Network for Auction Designcited by 19
  7. 2021Deep Learning for Two-Sided Matchingcited by 15
  8. 2022Daycare Matching in Japan: Transfers and Siblingscited by 3
  9. 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stabilitycited by 2
  10. 2024Stable Matchings in Practice: A Constraint Programming Approachcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.