mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Progent: Securing AI Agents with Privilege Control

arXiv 2504.11703 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 141

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents interact with external environments through tool calls, exposing them to attacks like indirect prompt injection that can trigger unauthorized actions. Securing these agents is challenging: they behave autonomously and probabilistically, security requirements evolve depending on the user's task and execution state, and there is an inherent tradeofff between security and utility. In this work, we introduce Progent, a novel framework that secures AI agents via privilege control. Progent represents privilege as a security policy consisting of symbolic rules over tool names and arguments. These rules specify which tool calls are allowed for task completion and which unnecessary ones are blocked for security. Every tool call is checked against such a policy through a deterministic procedure, enforcing the principle of least privilege. To handle diverse user tasks and evolving execution contexts, an LLM automatically generates the initial policy from the user's task and updates it during execution as new information arrives. Each proposed update is determined by an SMT solver to be either a narrowing (applied automatically) or an expansion (requiring explicit approval), ensuring that the agent's effective action space can only shrink without approval (monotonic confinement). This deterministic update mechanism preserves utility and prevents silent privilege escalation, even when adversarial inputs are present. Our evaluation on popular benchmarks (i.e., AgentDojo and ASB) shows that Progent significantly reduces attack success rates while maintaining high utility. We further validate Progent's practicality by showcasing its effectiveness in real-world agent frameworks such as LangChain and OpenAI Agents SDK.

Key facts. Cited by 141 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 22 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2025.

Builds on

22 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Defeating Prompt Injections by Design24 Mar
  2. 2024Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents3 Oct
  3. 2024EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakage17 Sep
  4. 2024The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studies28 Jul
  5. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May

Other references · 17

  1. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  3. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  4. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  5. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
  6. 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 564
  7. 2024The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructionscited by 493
  8. 2024StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queriescited by 375
  9. 2024Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks With Spotlightingcited by 267
  10. 2024Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Securitycited by 260
  11. 2024SecAlign: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Preference Optimizationcited by 210
  12. 2025DataSentinel: A Game-Theoretic Detection of Prompt Injection Attackscited by 143
5 more
  1. 2024System-Level Defense against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks: An Information Flow Control Perspectivecited by 96
  2. 2024A New Era in LLM Security: Exploring Security Concerns in Real-World LLM-based Systemscited by 77
  3. 2025Contextual Agent Security: A Policy for Every Purposecited by 59
  4. 2024Cedar: A New Language for Expressive, Fast, Safe, and Analyzable Authorization (Extended Version)cited by 34
  5. 2024GenTel-Safe: A Unified Benchmark and Shielding Framework for Defending Against Prompt Injection Attackscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 25; 2026: 116.

141 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025PromptArmor: Simple yet Effective Prompt Injection Defensescited by 108
  2. 2026Taming Various Privilege Escalation in LLM-Based Agent Systems: A Mandatory Access Control Frameworkcited by 54
  3. 2025AgentArmor: Enforcing Program Analysis on Agent Runtime Trace to Defend Against Prompt Injectioncited by 46
  4. 2025Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agentscited by 45
  5. 2025Enforcing Temporal Constraints for LLM Agentscited by 34
  6. 2026Prompt Injection Attacks on Agentic Coding Assistants: A Systematic Analysis of Vulnerabilities in Skills, Tools, and Protocol Ecosystemscited by 31
  7. 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysiscited by 30
  8. 2025LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principlescited by 29
  9. 2026The Attack and Defense Landscape of Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 28
  10. 2026A Survey on Long-Term Memory Security in LLM Agents: Attacks, Defenses, and Governance Across the Memory Lifecyclecited by 27
  11. 2025LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Frameworks: A Survey from Methods to Scenarioscited by 26
  12. 2025BrowseSafe: Understanding and Preventing Prompt Injection Within AI Browser Agentscited by 24
38 more
  1. 2025A Survey on Agentic Security: Applications, Threats and Defensescited by 20
  2. 2025PIShield: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks via Intrinsic LLM Featurescited by 20
  3. 2025Indirect Prompt Injections: Are Firewalls All You Need, or Stronger Benchmarks?cited by 18
  4. 2025ObliInjection: Order-Oblivious Prompt Injection Attack to LLM Agents with Multi-source Datacited by 18
  5. 2026When Safe Skills Collide: Measuring Compositional Risk in Agent Skill Ecosystemscited by 17
  6. 2025ceLLMate: Sandboxing Browser AI Agentscited by 16
  7. 2026Agent-Sentry: Bounding LLM Agents via Execution Provenancecited by 15
  8. 2026CausalArmor: Efficient Indirect Prompt Injection Guardrails via Causal Attributioncited by 14
  9. 2026When Benign Inputs Lead to Severe Harms: Eliciting Unsafe Unintended Behaviors of Computer-Use Agentscited by 14
  10. 2025Systems Security Foundations for Agentic Computingcited by 13
  11. 2025TraceAegis: Securing LLM-Based Agents via Hierarchical and Behavioral Anomaly Detectioncited by 12
  12. 2025Breaking and Fixing Defenses Against Control-Flow Hijacking in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 12
  13. 2026Trojan Hippo: Weaponizing Agent Memory for Data Exfiltrationcited by 12
  14. 2025Agent Safety Alignment via Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  15. 2025Secure and Efficient Access Control for Computer-Use Agents via Context Spacecited by 11
  16. 2025SoK: Trust-Authorization Mismatch in LLM Agent Interactionscited by 11
  17. 2026AgentGuardian: Learning Access Control Policies to Govern AI Agent Behaviorcited by 11
  18. 2026PIArena: A Platform for Prompt Injection Evaluationcited by 11
  19. 2026The Granularity Mismatch in Agent Security: Argument-Level Provenance Solves Enforcement and Isolates the LLM Reasoning Bottleneckcited by 11
  20. 2025SecInfer: Preventing Prompt Injection via Inference-time Scalingcited by 10
  21. 2026AgentSys: Secure and Dynamic LLM Agents Through Explicit Hierarchical Memory Managementcited by 10
  22. 2026ACRFence: Preventing Semantic Rollback Attacks in Agent Checkpoint-Restorecited by 10
  23. 2026Agent libOS: A Runtime Substrate for Capability-Controlled Self-Evolving LLM Agentscited by 10
  24. 2026Cloak and Detonate: Scanner Evasion and Dynamic Detection of Agent Skill Malwarecited by 10
  25. 2025Taxonomy, Evaluation and Exploitation of IPI-Centric LLM Agent Defense Frameworkscited by 9
  26. 2026Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attackscited by 9
  27. 2026Lingering Authority: Revocable Resource-and-Effect Capabilities for Coding Agentscited by 8
  28. 2026Safety in Self-Evolving LLM Agent Systems: Threats, Amplification, and Case Studiescited by 8
  29. 2026Contextualized Privacy Defense for LLM Agentscited by 7
  30. 2026Assessing Automated Prompt Injection Attacks in Agentic Environmentscited by 7
  31. 2026Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluationcited by 7
  32. 2026Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systemscited by 7
  33. 2026AgentWatcher: A Rule-based Prompt Injection Monitorcited by 6
  34. 2026SkillGuard: A Permission-Centric Framework for Agent Skill Securitycited by 6
  35. 2026SHE: Trajectory-driven Safety Harness Evolution for LLM Agentscited by 6
  36. 2026SMCP: Secure Model Context Protocolcited by 5
  37. 2026AC4A: Access Control for Agentscited by 5
  38. 2026AutoDojo: Adaptive Black-Box Attacks Reveal the Limits of IPI Defenses and Task-Specification Effects in LLM Agentscited by 5

50 most cited of 141 All 141 (JSON)

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ClawLess: A Security Model of AI Agents
  2. 2025AgentBound: Securing Execution Boundaries of AI Agents
  3. 2026Rethinking Agent Security as a Networking Problem
  4. 2026A Theory of Least Autonomy in AI
  5. 2026Dynamic Capability Scoping for Enterprise AI Agents: A Synthetic Dataset and Three-Source Permission Architecture
  6. 2026Optimizing Agent Planning for Security and Autonomy
  7. 2025AgentCrypt: Advancing Privacy and (Secure) Computation in AI Agent Collaboration
  8. 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI Requires Deterministic Architectural Boundaries