CoPE: A Small Language Model for Steerable and Scalable Content Labeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper details the methodology behind CoPE, a policy-steerable small language model capable of fast and accurate content labeling. We present a novel training curricula called Contradictory Example Training that enables the model to learn policy interpretation rather than mere policy memorization. We also present a novel method for generating content policies, called Binocular Labeling, which enables rapid construction of unambiguous training datasets. When evaluated across seven different harm areas, CoPE exhibits equal or superior accuracy to frontier models at only 1% of their size. We openly release a 9 billion parameter version of the model that can be run on a single consumer-grade GPU. Models like CoPE represent a paradigm shift for classifier systems. By turning an ML task into a policy writing task, CoPE opens up new design possibilities for the governance of online platforms.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.
Builds on
18 of 38 references.
References · 18
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
- 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 496
- 2022A Holistic Approach to Undesired Content Detection in the Real Worldcited by 356
- 2024ShieldGemma: Generative AI Content Moderation Based on Gemmacited by 243
- 2025Progent: Securing AI Agents with Privilege Controlcited by 141
- 2024Llama Guard 3 Vision: Safeguarding Human-AI Image Understanding Conversationscited by 129
- 2025GuardReasoner: Towards Reasoning-based LLM Safeguardscited by 100
- 2020ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Datasetcited by 66
- 2023Adapting Large Language Models for Content Moderation: Pitfalls in Data Engineering and Supervised Fine-tuningcited by 29
- 2025Is LLM an Overconfident Judge? Unveiling the Capabilities of LLMs in Detecting Offensive Language with Annotation Disagreementcited by 14
- 2025Policy-as-Prompt: Turning AI Governance Rules into Guardrails for AI Agentscited by 14
- 2024STAND-Guard: A Small Task-Adaptive Content Moderation Modelcited by 12
6 more
- 2025What Large Language Models Do Not Talk About: An Empirical Study of Moderation and Censorship Practicescited by 11
- 2024SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behaviorcited by 10
- 2025The Multilingual Divide and Its Impact on Global AI Safetycited by 10
- 2022Reliable Decision from Multiple Subtasks through Threshold Optimization: Content Moderation in the Wildcited by 7
- 2024Large Language Models for Automatic Detection of Sensitive Topicscited by 3
- 2025Probing Association Biases in LLM Moderation Over-Sensitivitycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishingcited by 5
- 2026Evaluating Criterion-Conditioned Behaviour of Large Language Models in Content Moderationcited by 0
- 2026StreamDecisionBench: Evaluating Decisions in Force on Evolving Language Streamscited by 0
- 2026To Jev or Not? Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Structured Decision Models for Hate-Speech Moderationcited by 0
- 2026To Jev or Not? Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Structured Decision Models for Hate-Speech Moderation2 Oct 2026
- 2026StreamDecisionBench: Evaluating Decisions in Force on Evolving Language Streams29 Sep 2026
- 2026Evaluating Criterion-Conditioned Behaviour of Large Language Models in Content Moderation3 Sep 2026
- 2026Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing11 May 2026