Efficient and Sound Probabilistic Verification for AI Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Securing AI agents that operate in complex digital environments has become a critical need, and runtime monitoring approaches that formulate and enforce policies expressed in a formal language like Datalog offer a promising solution. However, existing approaches are restricted to deterministic policies. In many practical applications of AI agents, there is a need to enforce security policies in the face of ambiguity, leading to probabilistic predicates or state transitions (for example, a declassifier or Personally Identifiable Information (PII) detector that has some failure probability on each invocation). Furthermore, in many such applications, one cannot easily make the independence assumptions necessary to invoke prior work on probabilistic inference in Datalog. We address this by introducing a sound and efficient framework for such verification based on distributionally robust optimization, computing sound upper bounds on the probability of policy violation regardless of possible correlations between predicates. On standard benchmarks for terminal and tool calling agents, we demonstrate that our approach outperforms prior art and improves the security-utility trade-off while ensuring rigorous bounds on the probability of policy violation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.
Builds on
34 of 60 references.
References · 34
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,502
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,117
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,541
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,274
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,181
- 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 547
- 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agentscited by 520
- 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 390
- 2024StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queriescited by 366
- 2024Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agentscited by 360
- 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 357
- 2025Defeating Prompt Injections by Designcited by 284
22 more
- 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 234
- 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agentscited by 209
- 2024SecAlign: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Preference Optimizationcited by 205
- 2025ShieldAgent: Shielding Agents via Verifiable Safety Policy Reasoningcited by 149
- 2025Progent: Securing AI Agents with Privilege Controlcited by 134
- 2024On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language Modelscited by 115
- 2025Securing AI Agents with Information-Flow Controlcited by 115
- 2018NL2Bash: A Corpus and Semantic Parser for Natural Language Interface to the Linux Operating Systemcited by 97
- 2024System-Level Defense against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks: An Information Flow Control Perspectivecited by 95
- 2025DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agentscited by 65
- 2023Scallop: A Language for Neurosymbolic Programmingcited by 63
- 2025Contextual Agent Security: A Policy for Every Purposecited by 57
- 2026AgentDoG: A Diagnostic Guardrail Framework for AI Agent Safety and Securitycited by 49
- 2025VeriGuard: Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Verified Code Generationcited by 48
- 2024Formal-LLM: Integrating Formal Language and Natural Language for Controllable LLM-based Agentscited by 39
- 2024Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistantscited by 36
- 2025Enforcing Temporal Constraints for LLM Agentscited by 32
- 2026Formal Policy Enforcement for Real-World Agentic Systemscited by 32
- 2026CausalArmor: Efficient Indirect Prompt Injection Guardrails via Causal Attributioncited by 14
- 2019Beyond the Grounding Bottleneck: Datalog Techniques for Inference in Probabilistic Logic Programs (Technical Report)cited by 6
- 2019Mitigating Power Side Channels during Compilationcited by 4
- 2025Probabilistic Inference for Datalog with Correlated Inputscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AgentGuard: Runtime Verification of AI Agents
- 2026TriCEGAR: A Trace-Driven Abstraction Mechanism for Agentic AI
- 2026Agent Behavioral Contracts: Formal Specification and Runtime Enforcement for Reliable Autonomous AI Agents
- 2025Are Agents Probabilistic Automata? A Trace-Based, Memory-Constrained Theory of Agentic AI
- 2026How to Verify Probabilistic Consistency of Predictive Models
- 2026ClawLess: A Security Model of AI Agents
- 2026Verification and Self-Improvement in Agentic AI: Foundations and Limits
- 2025ProbGuard: Proactive Runtime Monitoring for LLM Agent Safety via Probabilistic Prediction