Dynamic Capability Scoping for Enterprise AI Agents: A Synthetic Dataset and Three-Source Permission Architecture
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Enterprise AI agents are typically granted static credential sets at configuration time, holding every tool the role might need for every task they perform. This persistent over-privilege expands the attack surface. We argue that capability scoping must follow a dynamic least-privilege principle and be treated as a prevention mechanism before a detection one. A credential that does not exist in an agent's context cannot be misused regardless of the agent's reasoning or evasion sophistication. We outline a three-source architecture instantiating this principle: role-based ceilings, a task-context classifier, and policy-derived combination prohibitions creating a layered proactive defense against LLM agent misalignment and misuse cases. The architecture supports both enforcing and observe-only deployment; the latter records agent permission requests inconsistent with task context, producing a behavioral signal usable in misalignment research. As a first step toward evaluating this architecture, we contribute a synthetic dataset of 600 enterprise task prompts grounded in a multi-department company policy, labeled with minimum required permissions across a 15-permission tool-based taxonomy that maps directly to deployable credentials or enforceable guardrails. The dataset is constructed via a two-pass pipeline that separates prompt generation from permission labeling to avoid circularity, and is validated against a 60-record/688 decisions human-reviewed sample (Cohen's kappa = 0.917 pre-review and kappa = 0.967 post-review). Iterating between dataset and policy reduced ceiling violations from 46 to 3, a 93% reduction. This shows that synthetic prompt generation can drive policy refinement when the two are developed together. The dataset, environment specification, and generation pipeline are released to support evaluation of dynamic scoping mechanisms.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.
Builds on
9 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 8
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
- 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 316
- 2024Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Schemingcited by 252
- 2025Contextual Agent Security: A Policy for Every Purposecited by 55
- 2025Policy-as-Prompt: Turning AI Governance Rules into Guardrails for AI Agentscited by 12
- 2026A Systematic Security Evaluation of OpenClaw and Its Variantscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026A Theory of Least Autonomy in AI
- 2026Separating Capability from Permission: A Governance Framework for Agentic AI Autonomy Levels
- 2026A Five-Plane Reference Architecture for Runtime Governance of Production AI Agents
- 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
- 2026Authenticated Workflows: A Systems Approach to Protecting Agentic AI
- 2026Authorization Propagation in Multi-Agent AI Systems: Identity Governance as Infrastructure
- 2026Overlaying Governance: A Compositional Authorization Framework for Delegation and Scope in Agentic AI
- 2026A Policy Algebra for Trust-Preserving Agentic AI Execution