mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Contracting with a Learning Agent

arXiv 2401.16198 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2024cs.GT cs.AI cs.LGcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many real-life contractual relations differ completely from the clean, static model at the heart of principal-agent theory. Typically, they involve repeated strategic interactions of the principal and agent, taking place under uncertainty and over time. While appealing in theory, players seldom use complex dynamic strategies in practice, often preferring to circumvent complexity and approach uncertainty through learning. We initiate the study of repeated contracts with a learning agent, focusing on agents who achieve no-regret outcomes. Optimizing against a no-regret agent is a known open problem in general games; we achieve an optimal solution to this problem for a canonical contract setting, in which the agent's choice among multiple actions leads to success/failure. The solution has a surprisingly simple structure: for some α > 0, initially offer the agent a linear contract with scalar α, then switch to offering a linear contract with scalar 0. This switch causes the agent to ``free-fall'' through their action space and during this time provides the principal with non-zero reward at zero cost. Despite apparent exploitation of the agent, this dynamic contract can leave both players better off compared to the best static contract. Our results generalize beyond success/failure, to arbitrary non-linear contracts which the principal rescales dynamically. Finally, we quantify the dependence of our results on knowledge of the time horizon, and are the first to address this consideration in the study of strategizing against learning agents.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2024.

Builds on

37 of 61 references.

References · 37

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  2. 2018How Do Classifiers Induce Agents To Invest Effort Strategically?cited by 82
  3. 2021Strategic Classification in the Darkcited by 66
  4. 2020No-regret learning and mixed Nash equilibria: They do not mixcited by 49
  5. 2019Strategizing against No-regret Learnerscited by 48
  6. 2014Adaptive Contract Design for Crowdsourcing Markets: Bandit Algorithms for Repeated Principal-Agent Problemscited by 46
  7. 2017Selling to a No-Regret Buyercited by 43
  8. 2021Near-Optimal No-Regret Learning for Correlated Equilibria in Multi-Player General-Sum Gamescited by 43
  9. 2022The Sample Complexity of Online Contract Designcited by 35
  10. 2018Simple versus Optimal Contractscited by 33
  11. 2022Strategizing against Learners in Bayesian Gamescited by 33
  12. 2020Optimization of Scoring Rulescited by 28
25 more
  1. 2015Econometrics for Learning Agentscited by 23
  2. 2015Learning in Auctions: Regret is Hard, Envy is Easycited by 23
  3. 2021Auctions Between Regret-Minimizing Agentscited by 22
  4. 2020Contracts under Moral Hazard and Adverse Selectioncited by 21
  5. 2023Is Learning in Games Good for the Learners?cited by 19
  6. 2023Selling to Multiple No-Regret Buyerscited by 19
  7. 2020Mechanisms for a No-Regret Agent: Beyond the Common Priorcited by 18
  8. 2021How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning Agentscited by 17
  9. 2020The Complexity of Contractscited by 16
  10. 2020Bid Prediction in Repeated Auctions with Learningcited by 14
  11. 2022Multi-Agent Contractscited by 14
  12. 2018Learning Approximately Optimal Contractscited by 12
  13. 2021Bayesian Agency: Linear versus Tractable Contractscited by 12
  14. 2021Combinatorial Contractscited by 12
  15. 2023Principal-Agent Reward Shaping in MDPscited by 12
  16. 2015Learning and Efficiency in Games with Dynamic Populationcited by 9
  17. 2016Correlated and Coarse equilibria of Single-item auctionscited by 8
  18. 2022Contracts with Information Acquisition, via Scoring Rulescited by 8
  19. 2022Approximate Optimality of Linear Contracts Under Uncertaintycited by 7
  20. 2023Multi-Agent Contract Design: How to Commission Multiple Agents with Individual Outcomecited by 6
  21. 2023The Power of Menus in Contract Designcited by 5
  22. 2023On Supermodular Contracts and Dense Subgraphscited by 5
  23. 2020Optimal Collaterals in Multi-Enterprise Investment Networkscited by 4
  24. 2023Learning in Online Principal-Agent Interactions: The Power of Menuscited by 4
  25. 2023Ambiguous Contractscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 10; 2025: 7; 2026: 5.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Principal-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Orchestrating AI Agents with Contractscited by 8
  2. 2024Strategically-Robust Learning Algorithms for Bidding in First-Price Auctionscited by 7
  3. 2024Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learnerscited by 7
  4. 2025Swap Regret and Correlated Equilibria Beyond Normal-Form Gamescited by 7
  5. 2024Generalized Principal-Agent Problem with a Learning Agentcited by 5
  6. 2024Impact of Decentralized Learning on Player Utilities in Stackelberg Gamescited by 5
  7. 2024Is Knowledge Power? On the (Im)possibility of Learning from Strategic Interactionscited by 5
  8. 2025Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource Constraintscited by 5
  9. 2025Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification?cited by 5
  10. 2024Games with Payments between Learning Agentscited by 3
  11. 2024Learning to Mitigate Externalities: the Coase Theorem with Hindsight Rationalitycited by 3
  12. 2024Learning to Play Against Unknown Opponentscited by 3
10 more
  1. 2025Learning and Computation of Phi-Equilibria at the Frontier of Tractabilitycited by 3
  2. 2025Computational Intractability of Strategizing against Online Learnerscited by 2
  3. 2025Markets with Heterogeneous Agents: Dynamics and Survival of Bayesian vs. No-Regret Learnerscited by 1
  4. 2025Best of Both Worlds: Regret Minimization versus Minimax Playcited by 1
  5. 2026From No-Regret to Strategically Robust Learning in Repeated Auctionscited by 1
  6. 2024Learning Under Moral Hazard with Instrumental Regression and Generalized Method of Momentscited by 0
  7. 2026Is Online Linear Optimization Sufficient for Strategic Robustness?cited by 0
  8. 2026Learning Safely Without Knowing the World:COMPASS-Hedgecited by 0
  9. 2026Mean-based algorithms: A lower bound and regretcited by 0
  10. 2026Minimax-Optimal Online Contract Design with Unrestricted Bounded Contractscited by 0