Combinatorial Contracts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a new model of combinatorial contracts in which a principal delegates the execution of a costly task to an agent. To complete the task, the agent can take any subset of a given set of unobservable actions, each of which has an associated cost. The cost of a set of actions is the sum of the costs of the individual actions, and the principal's reward as a function of the chosen actions satisfies some form of diminishing returns. The principal incentivizes the agents through a contract, based on the observed outcome. Our main results are for the case where the task delegated to the agent is a project, which can be successful or not. We show that if the success probability as a function of the set of actions is gross substitutes, then an optimal contract can be computed with polynomially many value queries, whereas if it is submodular, the optimal contract is NP-hard. All our results extend to linear contracts for higher-dimensional outcome spaces, which we show to be robustly optimal given first moment constraints. Our analysis uncovers a new property of gross substitutes functions, and reveals many interesting connections between combinatorial contracts and combinatorial auctions, where gross substitutes is known to be the frontier for efficient computation.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2022The Sample Complexity of Online Contract Designcited by 35
- 2024Contracting with a Learning Agentcited by 23
- 2023Deep Contract Design via Discontinuous Networkscited by 11
- 2023Delegated Classificationcited by 10
- 2023Learning Optimal Contracts: How to Exploit Small Action Spacescited by 5
- 2024Repeated Contracting with Multiple Non-Myopic Agents: Policy Regret and Limited Liabilitycited by 4
- 2025The Pseudo-Dimension of Contractscited by 3
- 2025Learning to Incentivize in Repeated Principal-Agent Problems with Adversarial Agent Arrivalscited by 2
- 2026Reward Shaping for (Inference-Time) Alignment: A Stackelberg Game Perspectivecited by 2
- 2024Learning Under Moral Hazard with Instrumental Regression and Generalized Method of Momentscited by 0
- 2026The Optimal Sample Complexity of Linear Contractscited by 0
- 2026Microeconomic Foundations of Multi-Agent Learningcited by 0
- 2026Reward Shaping for (Inference-Time) Alignment: A Stackelberg Game Perspective31 Jan 2026
- 2026Microeconomic Foundations of Multi-Agent Learning6 Jan 2026
- 2026The Optimal Sample Complexity of Linear Contracts4 Jan 2026
- 2025Learning to Incentivize in Repeated Principal-Agent Problems with Adversarial Agent Arrivals29 May 2025
- 2025The Pseudo-Dimension of Contracts24 Jan 2025
- 2024Learning Under Moral Hazard with Instrumental Regression and Generalized Method of Moments31 May 2024
- 2024Repeated Contracting with Multiple Non-Myopic Agents: Policy Regret and Limited Liability27 Feb 2024
- 2024Contracting with a Learning Agent29 Jan 2024
- 2023Learning Optimal Contracts: How to Exploit Small Action Spaces18 Sep 2023
- 2023Deep Contract Design via Discontinuous Networks5 Jul 2023
- 2023Delegated Classification20 Jun 2023
- 2022The Sample Complexity of Online Contract Design10 Nov 2022