Optimal Collaterals in Multi-Enterprise Investment Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study a market of investments on networks, where each agent (vertex) can invest in any enterprise linked to her, and at the same time, raise capital for her firm's enterprise from other agents she is linked to. Failing to raise sufficient capital results with the firm defaulting, being unable to invest in others. Our main objective is to examine the role of collateral contracts in handling the strategic risk that can propagate to a systemic risk throughout the network in a cascade of defaults. We take a mechanism-design approach and solve for the optimal scheme of collateral contracts that capital raisers offer their investors. These contracts aim at sustaining the efficient level of investment as a unique Nash equilibrium, while minimizing the total collateral. Our main results contrast the network environment with its non-network counterpart (where the sets of investors and capital raisers are disjoint). We show that for acyclic investment networks, the network environment does not necessitate any additional collaterals, and systemic risk can be fully handled by optimal bilateral collateral contracts between capital raisers and their investors. This is, unfortunately, not the case for cyclic investment networks. We show that bilateral contracting will not suffice to resolve systemic risk, and the market will need an external entity to design a global collateral scheme for all capital raisers. Furthermore, the minimum total collateral that will sustain the efficient level of investment as a unique equilibrium may be arbitrarily higher, even in simple cyclic investment networks, compared with its corresponding non-network environment. Additionally, we prove computational-complexity results, both for a single enterprise and for networks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Contracting with a Learning Agentcited by 22
- 2021How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning Agentscited by 17
- 2024Games with Payments between Learning Agentscited by 3
- 2025Markets with Heterogeneous Agents: Dynamics and Survival of Bayesian vs. No-Regret Learnerscited by 1
- 2025Markets with Heterogeneous Agents: Dynamics and Survival of Bayesian vs. No-Regret Learners12 Feb 2025
- 2024Games with Payments between Learning Agents31 May 2024
- 2024Contracting with a Learning Agent29 Jan 2024
- 2021How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning Agents14 Dec 2021