Learning Safely Without Knowing the World:COMPASS-Hedge
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online learning algorithms often face a fundamental trilemma: balancing regret guarantees between adversarial and stochastic settings and providing baseline safety against a fixed comparator. While existing methods excel in one or two of these regimes, they typically fail to unify all three without sacrificing optimal rates or requiring oracle access to problem-dependent parameters. In this work, we bridge this gap by introducing COMPASS-Hedge. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithm is the first full-information anytime method to simultaneously achieve, up to logarithmic factors: i) minimax-optimal regret in adversarial environments; ii) instance-optimal, gap-dependent regret in stochastic environments; and iii) tildeO(1) regret relative to a designated baseline policy. Crucially, COMPASS-Hedge is parameter-free and requires no prior knowledge of the environment's nature or the magnitude of the stochastic suboptimality gaps. Our approach hinges on a novel integration of adaptive pseudo-regret scaling and phase-based aggression, coupled with a comparator-aware mixing strategy. To the best of our knowledge, this provides the first "best-of-three-world" guarantee in the full-information setting, establishing that baseline safety does not have to come at the cost of worst-case robustness or stochastic efficiency.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.
Builds on
28 of 55 references.
References · 28
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
- 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Constrained MDPscited by 146
- 2013Online Learning under Delayed Feedbackcited by 137
- 2016Coin Betting and Parameter-Free Online Learningcited by 131
- 2018Black-Box Reductions for Parameter-free Online Learning in Banach Spacescited by 124
- 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 123
- 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 113
- 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 91
- 2021Learning Policies with Zero or Bounded Constraint Violation for Constrained MDPscited by 78
- 2018What Doubling Tricks Can and Can't Do for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 69
- 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
16 more
- 2016Conservative Banditscited by 58
- 2021Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive Adversariescited by 57
- 2019Strategizing against No-regret Learnerscited by 48
- 2015Second-order Quantile Methods for Experts and Combinatorial Gamescited by 47
- 2017Selling to a No-Regret Buyercited by 43
- 2022Strategizing against Learners in Bayesian Gamescited by 33
- 2018On the optimality of the Hedge algorithm in the stochastic regimecited by 32
- 2024Contracting with a Learning Agentcited by 22
- 2020Online mirror descent and dual averaging: keeping pace in the dynamic casecited by 21
- 2020Conservative Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
- 2015The Pareto Regret Frontier for Banditscited by 13
- 2020Comparator-adaptive Convex Banditscited by 11
- 2024Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learnerscited by 7
- 2016Online Charging Scheduling Algorithms of Electric Vehicles in Smart Grid: An Overviewcited by 2
- 2025Efficient Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithms for Contextual Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 2
- 2025Best of Both Worlds: Regret Minimization versus Minimax Playcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.