From No-Regret to Strategically Robust Learning in Repeated Auctions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In Bayesian single-item auctions, a monotone bidding strategy--one that prescribes a higher bid for a higher value type--can be equivalently represented as a partition of the quantile space into consecutive intervals corresponding to increasing bids. Kumar et al. (2024) prove that agile online gradient descent (OGD), when used to update a monotone bidding strategy through its quantile representation, is strategically robust in repeated first-price auctions: when all bidders employ agile OGD in this way, the auctioneer's average revenue per round is at most the revenue of Myerson's optimal auction, regardless of how she adjusts the reserve price over time. In this work, we show that this strategic robustness guarantee is not unique to agile OGD or to the first-price auction: any no-regret learning algorithm, when fed gradient feedback with respect to the quantile representation, is strategically robust, even if the auction format changes every round, provided the format satisfies allocation monotonicity and voluntary participation. In particular, the multiplicative weights update (MWU) algorithm simultaneously achieves the optimal regret guarantee and a strong strategic robustness guarantee in this auction setting. At a technical level, our results are established via a simple relation that bridges Myerson's auction theory and standard no-regret learning theory.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2026.
Builds on
36 of 49 references.
References · 36
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
- 2019Strategizing against No-regret Learnerscited by 50
- 2017Selling to a No-Regret Buyercited by 43
- 2013Learning Prices for Repeated Auctions with Strategic Buyerscited by 37
- 2022Strategizing against Learners in Bayesian Gamescited by 34
- 2020Optimal No-regret Learning in Repeated First-price Auctionscited by 33
- 2023Fast swap regret minimization and applications to approximate correlated equilibriacited by 32
- 2018Contextual Bandits with Cross-learningcited by 31
- 2024Auto-bidding and Auctions in Online Advertising: A Surveycited by 26
- 2015Econometrics for Learning Agentscited by 23
- 2024Contracting with a Learning Agentcited by 23
24 more
- 2021Auctions Between Regret-Minimizing Agentscited by 22
- 2021Learning to Bid in Contextual First Price Auctionscited by 19
- 2023Selling to Multiple No-Regret Buyerscited by 19
- 2021How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning Agentscited by 17
- 2024Pareto-Optimal Algorithms for Learning in Gamescited by 16
- 2020Convergence Analysis of No-Regret Bidding Algorithms in Repeated Auctionscited by 14
- 2024Efficient Learning and Computation of Linear Correlated Equilibrium in General Convex Gamescited by 12
- 2022Leveraging the Hints: Adaptive Bidding in Repeated First-Price Auctionscited by 11
- 2018Learning Optimal Reserve Price against Non-myopic Bidderscited by 10
- 2024No-Regret Algorithms in non-Truthful Auctions with Budget and ROI Constraintscited by 9
- 2024Strategizing against No-Regret Learners in First-Price Auctionscited by 8
- 2025Swap Regret and Correlated Equilibria Beyond Normal-Form Gamescited by 8
- 2024Strategically-Robust Learning Algorithms for Bidding in First-Price Auctionscited by 7
- 2024Generalized Principal-Agent Problem with a Learning Agentcited by 6
- 2024First-order (coarse) correlated equilibria in non-concave gamescited by 5
- 2024Is Knowledge Power? On the (Im)possibility of Learning from Strategic Interactionscited by 5
- 2024Games with Payments between Learning Agentscited by 3
- 2025Proximal Regret and Proximal Correlated Equilibria: A New Tractable Solution Concept for Online Learning and Gamescited by 3
- 2025Prior-Independent Bidding Strategies for First-Price Auctionscited by 2
- 2025Semicoarse Correlated Equilibria and LP-Based Guarantees for Gradient Dynamics in Normal-Form Gamescited by 2
- 2025Computational Intractability of Strategizing against Online Learnerscited by 2
- 2025No-Regret Online Autobidding Algorithms in First-price Auctionscited by 2
- 2025Markets with Heterogeneous Agents: Dynamics and Survival of Bayesian vs. No-Regret Learnerscited by 1
- 2025Strategy-robust Online Learning in Contextual Pricingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.