mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource Constraints

arXiv 2505.23436 ↗First posted 29 May 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Advanced reasoning models with agentic capabilities (AI agents) are deployed to interact with humans and to solve sequential decision-making problems under (approximate) utility functions and internal models. When such problems have resource or failure constraints where action sequences may be forcibly terminated once resources are exhausted, agents face implicit trade-offs that reshape their utility-driven (rational) behaviour. Additionally, since these agents are typically commissioned by a human principal to act on their behalf, asymmetries in constraint exposure can give rise to previously unanticipated misalignment between human objectives and agent incentives. We formalise this setting through a survival bandit framework, provide theoretical and empirical results that quantify the impact of survival-driven preference shifts, identify conditions under which misalignment emerges and propose mechanisms to mitigate the emergence of risk-seeking or risk-averse behaviours. As a result, this work aims to increase understanding and interpretability of emergent behaviours of AI agents operating under such survival pressure, and offer guidelines for safely deploying such AI systems in critical resource-limited environments.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.

Builds on

25 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Deception in LLMs: Self-Preservation and Autonomous Goals in Large Language Models27 Jan

Other references · 24

  1. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  2. 2023AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 263
  3. 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applicationscited by 181
  4. 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 177
  5. 2022Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goalscited by 126
  6. 2016The Off-Switch Gamecited by 97
  7. 2014Bandits with concave rewards and convex knapsackscited by 83
  8. 2017Time Limits in Reinforcement Learningcited by 79
  9. 2022Safe Reinforcement Learning by Imagining the Near Futurecited by 67
  10. 2017How Should a Robot Assess Risk? Towards an Axiomatic Theory of Risk in Roboticscited by 59
  11. 2023State-wise Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 55
  12. 2022Strategizing against Learners in Bayesian Gamescited by 34
12 more
  1. 2024AI Alignment with Changing and Influenceable Reward Functionscited by 33
  2. 2025Evaluating the Paperclip Maximizer: Are RL-Based Language Models More Likely to Pursue Instrumental Goals?cited by 33
  3. 2019Rethinking the Discount Factor in Reinforcement Learning: A Decision Theoretic Approachcited by 32
  4. 2022Misspecification in Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
  5. 2024Contracting with a Learning Agentcited by 23
  6. 2020Contracts under Moral Hazard and Adverse Selectioncited by 21
  7. 2022Multi-Agent Contractscited by 14
  8. 2021Choice Set Misspecification in Reward Inferencecited by 13
  9. 2019Terminal Prediction as an Auxiliary Task for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  10. 2023Human Control: Definitions and Algorithmscited by 10
  11. 2019Corrigibility with Utility Preservationcited by 8
  12. 2022The Survival Bandit Problemcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Absolutist AI
  2. 2025Agentic AI Needs a Systems Theory
  3. 2026Epistemic Traps: Rational Misalignment Driven by Model Misspecification
  4. 2023Of Models and Tin Men: A Behavioural Economics Study of Principal-Agent Problems in AI Alignment using Large-Language Models
  5. 2026Grounded Scaling: Why Agentic AI Needs Deterministic Environments
  6. 2024From homeostasis to resource sharing: Biologically and economically aligned multi-objective multi-agent gridworld-based AI safety benchmarks
  7. 2026Increasing intelligence in AI agents can worsen collective outcomes
  8. 2021Making Human-Like Trade-offs in Constrained Environments by Learning from Demonstrations