mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Chaos persists in large-scale multi-agent learning despite adaptive learning rates

arXiv 2306.01032 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2023cs.LG math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent learning is intrinsically harder, more unstable and unpredictable than single agent optimization. For this reason, numerous specialized heuristics and techniques have been designed towards the goal of achieving convergence to equilibria in self-play. One such celebrated approach is the use of dynamically adaptive learning rates. Although such techniques are known to allow for improved convergence guarantees in small games, it has been much harder to analyze them in more relevant settings with large populations of agents. These settings are particularly hard as recent work has established that learning with fixed rates will become chaotic given large enough populations.In this work, we show that chaos persists in large population congestion games despite using adaptive learning rates even for the ubiquitous Multiplicative Weight Updates algorithm, even in the presence of only two strategies. At a technical level, due to the non-autonomous nature of the system, our approach goes beyond conventional period-three techniques Li-Yorke by studying fundamental properties of the dynamics including invariant sets, volume expansion and turbulent sets. We complement our theoretical insights with experiments showcasing that slight variations to system parameters lead to a wide variety of unpredictable behaviors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2017Cycles in adversarial regularized learningcited by 124
  3. 2018The Mechanics of n-Player Differentiable Gamescited by 118
  4. 2020The limits of min-max optimization algorithms: convergence to spurious non-critical setscited by 50
  5. 2020No-regret learning and mixed Nash equilibria: They do not mixcited by 50
  6. 2022Multi-agent Performative Prediction: From Global Stability and Optimality to Chaoscited by 33
  7. 2017Multiplicative Weights Update with Constant Step-Size in Congestion Games: Convergence, Limit Cycles and Chaoscited by 29
  8. 2019Finite Regret and Cycles with Fixed Step-Size via Alternating Gradient Descent-Ascentcited by 29
  9. 2019Vortices Instead of Equilibria in MinMax Optimization: Chaos and Butterfly Effects of Online Learning in Zero-Sum Gamescited by 25
  10. 2021Survival of the strictest: Stable and unstable equilibria under regularized learning with partial informationcited by 23
  11. 2013Nash Convergence of Gradient Dynamics in Iterated General-Sum Gamescited by 18
  12. 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Multi-Agent Learning: Catastrophe Theory Meets Game Theorycited by 17
10 more
  1. 2020On the Impossibility of Global Convergence in Multi-Loss Optimizationcited by 16
  2. 2020Chaos, Extremism and Optimism: Volume Analysis of Learning in Gamescited by 16
  3. 2019The route to chaos in routing games: When is Price of Anarchy too optimistic?cited by 15
  4. 2019Fast and Furious Learning in Zero-Sum Games: Vanishing Regret with Non-Vanishing Step Sizescited by 14
  5. 2021Learning in Matrix Games can be Arbitrarily Complexcited by 11
  6. 2021Follow-the-Regularized-Leader Routes to Chaos in Routing Gamescited by 10
  7. 2020Chaos of Learning Beyond Zero-sum and Coordination via Game Decompositionscited by 9
  8. 2014A Multiagent Reinforcement Learning Algorithm with Non-linear Dynamicscited by 5
  9. 2021Dynamical Analysis of the EIP-1559 Ethereum Fee Marketcited by 3
  10. 2021Learning in Markets: Greed Leads to Chaos but Following the Price is Rightcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.