mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methods

arXiv 2002.11955 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2020stat.ML cs.LGcited by 98

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Weak supervision is a popular method for building machine learning models without relying on ground truth annotations. Instead, it generates probabilistic training labels by estimating the accuracies of multiple noisy labeling sources (e.g., heuristics, crowd workers). Existing approaches use latent variable estimation to model the noisy sources, but these methods can be computationally expensive, scaling superlinearly in the data. In this work, we show that, for a class of latent variable models highly applicable to weak supervision, we can find a closed-form solution to model parameters, obviating the need for iterative solutions like stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We use this insight to build FlyingSquid, a weak supervision framework that runs orders of magnitude faster than previous weak supervision approaches and requires fewer assumptions. In particular, we prove bounds on generalization error without assuming that the latent variable model can exactly parameterize the underlying data distribution. Empirically, we validate FlyingSquid on benchmark weak supervision datasets and find that it achieves the same or higher quality compared to previous approaches without the need to tune an SGD procedure, recovers model parameters 170 times faster on average, and enables new video analysis and online learning applications.

Key facts. Cited by 98 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 33; 2023: 18; 2024: 18; 2025: 10; 2026: 8.

98 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 635
  2. 2022Ask Me Anything: A simple strategy for prompting language modelscited by 155
  3. 2023Language Models Enable Simple Systems for Generating Structured Views of Heterogeneous Data Lakescited by 101
  4. 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 95
  5. 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
  6. 2022Language Models in the Loop: Incorporating Prompting into Weak Supervisioncited by 51
  7. 2024Theoretical Analysis of Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 46
  8. 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
  9. 2024Smoothie: Label Free Language Model Routingcited by 31
  10. 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
  11. 2021Universalizing Weak Supervisioncited by 27
  12. 2022Co-training Improves Prompt-based Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 24
38 more
  1. 2024Weak-to-Strong Generalization Through the Data-Centric Lenscited by 21
  2. 2025Shrinking the Generation-Verification Gap with Weak Verifierscited by 21
  3. 2022Training Subset Selection for Weak Supervisioncited by 19
  4. 2021DP-SSL: Towards Robust Semi-supervised Learning with A Few Labeled Samplescited by 18
  5. 2022Shoring Up the Foundations: Fusing Model Embeddings and Weak Supervisioncited by 18
  6. 2021skweak: Weak Supervision Made Easy for NLPcited by 17
  7. 2022Learning Hyper Label Model for Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 16
  8. 2021Creating Training Sets via Weak Indirect Supervisioncited by 14
  9. 2023Weakly Supervised Veracity Classification with LLM-Predicted Credibility Signalscited by 14
  10. 2022Losses over Labels: Weakly Supervised Learning via Direct Loss Constructioncited by 11
  11. 2024The Road to Artificial SuperIntelligence: A Comprehensive Survey of Superalignmentcited by 11
  12. 2022Nemo: Guiding and Contextualizing Weak Supervision for Interactive Data Programmingcited by 10
  13. 2022Lifting Weak Supervision To Structured Predictioncited by 10
  14. 2024The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotatorscited by 10
  15. 2025SQLens: An End-to-End Framework for Error Detection and Correction in Text-to-SQLcited by 10
  16. 2026CARE: Confounder-Aware Aggregation for Reliable LLM Evaluationcited by 10
  17. 2022Label Propagation with Weak Supervisioncited by 9
  18. 2024WeakSAM: Segment Anything Meets Weakly-supervised Instance-level Recognitioncited by 9
  19. 2022Understanding Programmatic Weak Supervision via Source-aware Influence Functioncited by 8
  20. 2023Alfred: A System for Prompted Weak Supervisioncited by 8
  21. 2024Multimodal Data Curation via Object Detection and Filter Ensemblescited by 8
  22. 2021Comparing the Value of Labeled and Unlabeled Data in Method-of-Moments Latent Variable Estimationcited by 7
  23. 2022Meta Self-Refinement for Robust Learning with Weak Supervisioncited by 7
  24. 2022MiDAS: Multi-integrated Domain Adaptive Supervision for Fake News Detectioncited by 7
  25. 2022AutoWS-Bench-101: Benchmarking Automated Weak Supervision with 100 Labelscited by 7
  26. 2022Adaptive Ranking-based Sample Selection for Weakly Supervised Class-imbalanced Text Classificationcited by 7
  27. 2021Dependency Structure Misspecification in Multi-Source Weak Supervision Modelscited by 6
  28. 2022Leveraging Instance Features for Label Aggregation in Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 6
  29. 2022Promises and Pitfalls of Threshold-based Auto-labelingcited by 6
  30. 2022Transformers for End-to-End InfoSec Tasks: A Feasibility Studycited by 6
  31. 2022WeCheck: Strong Factual Consistency Checker via Weakly Supervised Learningcited by 6
  32. 2023Can Large Language Models Design Accurate Label Functions?cited by 6
  33. 2024Bayesian WeakS-to-Strong from Text Classification to Generationcited by 6
  34. 2022Ground Truth Inference for Weakly Supervised Entity Matchingcited by 5
  35. 2023Pareto Optimal Learning for Estimating Large Language Model Errorscited by 5
  36. 2025Time To Impeach LLM-as-a-Judge: Programs are the Future of Evaluationcited by 5
  37. 2021TagRuler: Interactive Tool for Span-Level Data Programming by Demonstrationcited by 4
  38. 2022SepLL: Separating Latent Class Labels from Weak Supervision Noisecited by 4

50 most cited of 98 All 98 (JSON)