mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Large Language Models Design Accurate Label Functions?

arXiv 2311.00739 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.DB cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Programmatic weak supervision methodologies facilitate the expedited labeling of extensive datasets through the use of label functions (LFs) that encapsulate heuristic data sources. Nonetheless, the creation of precise LFs necessitates domain expertise and substantial endeavors. Recent advances in pre-trained language models (PLMs) have exhibited substantial potential across diverse tasks. However, the capacity of PLMs to autonomously formulate accurate LFs remains an underexplored domain. In this research, we address this gap by introducing DataSculpt, an interactive framework that harnesses PLMs for the automated generation of LFs. Within DataSculpt, we incorporate an array of prompting techniques, instance selection strategies, and LF filtration methods to explore the expansive design landscape. Ultimately, we conduct a thorough assessment of DataSculpt's performance on 12 real-world datasets, encompassing a range of tasks. This evaluation unveils both the strengths and limitations of contemporary PLMs in LF design.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.

Builds on

24 of 46 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  8. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  9. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  10. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
  11. 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
  12. 2022BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Miningcited by 531
12 more
  1. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
  2. 2022Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?cited by 173
  3. 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 154
  4. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  5. 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
  6. 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 95
  7. 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
  8. 2018Snorkel DryBell: A Case Study in Deploying Weak Supervision at Industrial Scalecited by 52
  9. 2020Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labelingcited by 52
  10. 2020Denoising Multi-Source Weak Supervision for Neural Text Classificationcited by 42
  11. 2022Evaluating Unsupervised Text Classification: Zero-shot and Similarity-based Approachescited by 39
  12. 2019NERO: A Neural Rule Grounding Framework for Label-Efficient Relation Extractioncited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

6 papers.