Leveraging Instance Features for Label Aggregation in Programmatic Weak Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) has emerged as a widespread paradigm to synthesize training labels efficiently. The core component of PWS is the label model, which infers true labels by aggregating the outputs of multiple noisy supervision sources abstracted as labeling functions (LFs). Existing statistical label models typically rely only on the outputs of LF, ignoring the instance features when modeling the underlying generative process. In this paper, we attempt to incorporate the instance features into a statistical label model via the proposed FABLE. In particular, it is built on a mixture of Bayesian label models, each corresponding to a global pattern of correlation, and the coefficients of the mixture components are predicted by a Gaussian Process classifier based on instance features. We adopt an auxiliary variable-based variational inference algorithm to tackle the non-conjugate issue between the Gaussian Process and Bayesian label models. Extensive empirical comparison on eleven benchmark datasets sees FABLE achieving the highest averaged performance across nine baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2022.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
References · 16
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
- 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
- 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
- 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 96
- 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
- 2017Learning the Structure of Generative Models without Labeled Datacited by 50
- 2020Denoising Multi-Source Weak Supervision for Neural Text Classificationcited by 42
- 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
- 2021Universalizing Weak Supervisioncited by 27
- 2017Inferring Generative Model Structure with Static Analysiscited by 18
- 2019Multi-Class Gaussian Process Classification Made Conjugate: Efficient Inference via Data Augmentationcited by 16
4 more
- 2021Learning from Multiple Noisy Partial Labelerscited by 14
- 2021Creating Training Sets via Weak Indirect Supervisioncited by 14
- 2021Dependency Structure Misspecification in Multi-Source Weak Supervision Modelscited by 6
- 2022Binary Classification with Positive Labeling Sourcescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Towards Acyclic Preference Evaluation of Language Models via Multiple Evaluatorscited by 13
- 2024Multimodal Data Curation via Object Detection and Filter Ensemblescited by 8
- 2023Mitigating Source Bias for Fairer Weak Supervisioncited by 3
- 2024Employing Label Models on ChatGPT Answers Improves Legal Text Entailment Performancecited by 2
- 2025Reliable Programmatic Weak Supervision with Confidence Intervals for Label Probabilitiescited by 1
- 2023Local Boosting for Weakly-Supervised Learningcited by 0
- 2025Reliable Programmatic Weak Supervision with Confidence Intervals for Label Probabilities5 Aug 2025
- 2024Towards Acyclic Preference Evaluation of Language Models via Multiple Evaluators14 Oct 2024
- 2024Employing Label Models on ChatGPT Answers Improves Legal Text Entailment Performance31 Jan 2024
- 2024Multimodal Data Curation via Object Detection and Filter Ensembles5 Jan 2024
- 2023Local Boosting for Weakly-Supervised Learning5 Jun 2023
- 2023Mitigating Source Bias for Fairer Weak Supervision30 Mar 2023