mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Structured Exploration and Exploitation of Label Functions for Automated Data Annotation

arXiv 2604.08578 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality labeled data is critical for training reliable machine learning and deep learning models, yet manual annotation remains costly and error-prone. Programmatic labeling addresses this challenge by using label functions (LFs), i.e., heuristic rules that automatically generate weak labels for training datasets. However, existing automated LF generation methods either rely on large language models (LLMs) to synthesize surface-level heuristics or employ model-based synthesis over hand-crafted primitives. These approaches often result in limited coverage and unreliable label quality. In this paper, we introduce EXPONA, an automated framework for programmatic labeling that formulates LF generation as a principled process balancing diversity and reliability. EXPONA systematically explores multi-level LFs, spanning surface, structural, and semantic perspectives. EXPONA further applies reliability-aware mechanisms to suppress noisy or redundant heuristics while preserving complementary signals. To evaluate EXPONA, we conducted extensive experiments on eleven classification datasets across diverse domains. Experimental results show that EXPONA consistently outperformed state-of-the-art automated LF generation methods. Specifically, EXPONA achieved nearly complete label coverage (up to 98.9%), improved weak label quality by up to 87%, and yielded downstream performance gains of up to 46% in weighted F1. These results indicate that EXPONA's combination of multi-level LF exploration and reliability-aware filtering enabled more consistent label quality and downstream performance across diverse tasks by balancing coverage and precision in the generated LF set.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2026.

Builds on

31 of 55 references.

References · 31

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 554
  4. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 372
  5. 2013Good Debt or Bad Debt: Detecting Semantic Orientations in Economic Textscited by 310
  6. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  7. 2022ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generationcited by 211
  8. 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 203
  9. 2021Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Helpcited by 196
  10. 2023AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotatorscited by 172
  11. 2018Synthetic Data Augmentation using GAN for Improved Liver Lesion Classificationcited by 136
  12. 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
19 more
  1. 2023LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotatorscited by 79
  2. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 58
  3. 2020Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labelingcited by 52
  4. 2022Language Models in the Loop: Incorporating Prompting into Weak Supervisioncited by 52
  5. 2020Denoising Multi-Source Weak Supervision for Neural Text Classificationcited by 42
  6. 2022Tuning Language Models as Training Data Generators for Augmentation-Enhanced Few-Shot Learningcited by 36
  7. 2021Weakly Supervised Named Entity Tagging with Learnable Logical Rulescited by 21
  8. 2025Just Put a Human in the Loop? Investigating LLM-Assisted Annotation for Subjective Taskscited by 21
  9. 2019GOGGLES: Automatic Image Labeling with Affinity Codingcited by 19
  10. 2020Adaptive Rule Discovery for Labeling Text Datacited by 15
  11. 2021GLaRA: Graph-based Labeling Rule Augmentation for Weakly Supervised Named Entity Recognitioncited by 12
  12. 2024The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotatorscited by 10
  13. 2023Weaker Than You Think: A Critical Look at Weakly Supervised Learningcited by 8
  14. 2022Promises and Pitfalls of Threshold-based Auto-labelingcited by 6
  15. 2025Delving into Instance-Dependent Label Noise in Graph Data: A Comprehensive Study and Benchmarkcited by 4
  16. 2024Pearls from Pebbles: Improved Confidence Functions for Auto-labelingcited by 3
  17. 2024ActiveDP: Bridging Active Learning and Data Programmingcited by 1
  18. 2025Refining Labeling Functions with Limited Labeled Datacited by 1
  19. 2025Reliable Programmatic Weak Supervision with Confidence Intervals for Label Probabilitiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.