Learning with Noisy Labels by Adaptive Gradient-Based Outlier Removal
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An accurate and substantial dataset is essential for training a reliable and well-performing model. However, even manually annotated datasets contain label errors, not to mention automatically labeled ones. Previous methods for label denoising have primarily focused on detecting outliers and their permanent removal - a process that is likely to over- or underfilter the dataset. In this work, we propose AGRA: a new method for learning with noisy labels by using Adaptive GRAdient-based outlier removal. Instead of cleaning the dataset prior to model training, the dataset is dynamically adjusted during the training process. By comparing the aggregated gradient of a batch of samples and an individual example gradient, our method dynamically decides whether a corresponding example is helpful for the model at this point or is counter-productive and should be left out for the current update. Extensive evaluation on several datasets demonstrates AGRA's effectiveness, while a comprehensive results analysis supports our initial hypothesis: permanent hard outlier removal is not always what model benefits the most from.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2023.
Builds on
35 of 56 references.
References · 35
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 516
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 372
- 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2021Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 258
23 more
- 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 161
- 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
- 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
- 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 96
- 2019CrossWeigh: Training Named Entity Tagger from Imperfect Annotationscited by 60
- 2020Learning from Rules Generalizing Labeled Exemplarscited by 59
- 2021CheXtransfer: Performance and Parameter Efficiency of ImageNet Models for Chest X-Ray Interpretationcited by 57
- 2020Transfer Learning and Distant Supervision for Multilingual Transformer Models: A Study on African Languagescited by 52
- 2021Self-Training with Weak Supervisioncited by 49
- 2020Denoising Multi-Source Weak Supervision for Neural Text Classificationcited by 42
- 2021sigmoidF1: A Smooth F1 Score Surrogate Loss for Multilabel Classificationcited by 23
- 2020Learning Not to Learn in the Presence of Noisy Labelscited by 9
- 2020Weak Supervision and Referring Attention for Temporal-Textual Association Learningcited by 8
- 2021ANEA: Distant Supervision for Low-Resource Named Entity Recognitioncited by 8
- 2021Knodle: Modular Weakly Supervised Learning with PyTorchcited by 7
- 2021Structured dataset documentation: a datasheet for CheXpertcited by 6
- 2021Hybrid Supervision Learning for Pathology Whole Slide Image Classificationcited by 5
- 2022SepLL: Separating Latent Class Labels from Weak Supervision Noisecited by 4
- 2021Image Embedding and Model Ensembling for Automated Chest X-Ray Interpretationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Evaluating Sample Utility for Efficient Data Selection by Mimicking Model Weightscited by 3
- 2025Influence-driven Curriculum Learning for Pre-training on Limited Datacited by 2
- 2025Layer-Aware Influence for Online Data Valuation Estimationcited by 2
- 2024Mislabeled examples detection viewed as probing machine learning models: concepts, survey and extensive benchmarkcited by 1
- 2025Layer-Aware Influence for Online Data Valuation Estimation14 Oct 2025
- 2025Influence-driven Curriculum Learning for Pre-training on Limited Data21 Aug 2025
- 2025Evaluating Sample Utility for Efficient Data Selection by Mimicking Model Weights12 Jan 2025
- 2024Mislabeled examples detection viewed as probing machine learning models: concepts, survey and extensive benchmark21 Oct 2024