mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Shoring Up the Foundations: Fusing Model Embeddings and Weak Supervision

arXiv 2203.13270 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2022stat.ML cs.LGcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models offer an exciting new paradigm for constructing models with out-of-the-box embeddings and a few labeled examples. However, it is not clear how to best apply foundation models without labeled data. A potential approach is to fuse foundation models with weak supervision frameworks, which use weak label sources -- pre-trained models, heuristics, crowd-workers -- to construct pseudolabels. The challenge is building a combination that best exploits the signal available in both foundation models and weak sources. We propose Liger, a combination that uses foundation model embeddings to improve two crucial elements of existing weak supervision techniques. First, we produce finer estimates of weak source quality by partitioning the embedding space and learning per-part source accuracies. Second, we improve source coverage by extending source votes in embedding space. Despite the black-box nature of foundation models, we prove results characterizing how our approach improves performance and show that lift scales with the smoothness of label distributions in embedding space. On six benchmark NLP and video tasks, Liger outperforms vanilla weak supervision by 14.1 points, weakly-supervised kNN and adapters by 11.8 points, and kNN and adapters supervised by traditional hand labels by 7.2 points.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.

Builds on

31 of 52 references.

References · 31

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  7. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  8. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  9. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  10. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  11. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  12. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
19 more
  1. 2019Generalization through Memorization: Nearest Neighbor Language Modelscited by 788
  2. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
  3. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
  4. 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 358
  5. 2019Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 287
  6. 2018Deep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learningcited by 203
  7. 2021Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Helpcited by 196
  8. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  9. 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
  10. 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 95
  11. 2018Snorkel DryBell: A Case Study in Deploying Weak Supervision at Industrial Scalecited by 52
  12. 2017Learning From Noisy Singly-labeled Datacited by 50
  13. 2018Generating Multi-Agent Trajectories using Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 46
  14. 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
  15. 2019Learning Dependency Structures for Weak Supervision Modelscited by 32
  16. 2019Multi-Resolution Weak Supervision for Sequential Datacited by 17
  17. 2019Rekall: Specifying Video Events using Compositions of Spatiotemporal Labelscited by 14
  18. 2021Comparing the Value of Labeled and Unlabeled Data in Method-of-Moments Latent Variable Estimationcited by 7
  19. 2019Pairwise Feedback for Data Programmingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 8; 2023: 5; 2024: 5.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area: