SepLL: Separating Latent Class Labels from Weak Supervision Noise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the weakly supervised learning paradigm, labeling functions automatically assign heuristic, often noisy, labels to data samples. In this work, we provide a method for learning from weak labels by separating two types of complementary information associated with the labeling functions: information related to the target label and information specific to one labeling function only. Both types of information are reflected to different degrees by all labeled instances. In contrast to previous works that aimed at correcting or removing wrongly labeled instances, we learn a branched deep model that uses all data as-is, but splits the labeling function information in the latent space. Specifically, we propose the end-to-end model SepLL which extends a transformer classifier by introducing a latent space for labeling function specific and task-specific information. The learning signal is only given by the labeling functions matches, no pre-processing or label model is required for our method. Notably, the task prediction is made from the latent layer without any direct task signal. Experiments on Wrench text classification tasks show that our model is competitive with the state-of-the-art, and yields a new best average performance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2022.
Builds on
20 of 43 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
- 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 308
- 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
- 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 220
- 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
- 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 95
- 2020Fine-Tuning Pre-trained Language Model with Weak Supervision: A Contrastive-Regularized Self-Training Approachcited by 83
8 more
- 2019SemEval-2010 Task 8: Multi-Way Classification of Semantic Relations Between Pairs of Nominalscited by 63
- 2020Learning from Rules Generalizing Labeled Exemplarscited by 59
- 2021Self-Training with Weak Supervisioncited by 49
- 2020Denoising Multi-Source Weak Supervision for Neural Text Classificationcited by 42
- 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
- 2021Knodle: Modular Weakly Supervised Learning with PyTorchcited by 7
- 2022Meta Self-Refinement for Robust Learning with Weak Supervisioncited by 7
- 2021KnowMAN: Weakly Supervised Multinomial Adversarial Networkscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Weaker Than You Think: A Critical Look at Weakly Supervised Learningcited by 8
- 2023Learning with Noisy Labels by Adaptive Gradient-Based Outlier Removalcited by 4
- 2024Cross-Platform Hate Speech Detection with Weakly Supervised Causal Disentanglementcited by 1
- 2023Local Boosting for Weakly-Supervised Learningcited by 0
- 2024Cross-Platform Hate Speech Detection with Weakly Supervised Causal Disentanglement17 Apr 2024
- 2023Learning with Noisy Labels by Adaptive Gradient-Based Outlier Removal7 Jun 2023
- 2023Local Boosting for Weakly-Supervised Learning5 Jun 2023
- 2023Weaker Than You Think: A Critical Look at Weakly Supervised Learning27 May 2023