mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

WeCheck: Strong Factual Consistency Checker via Weakly Supervised Learning

arXiv 2212.10057 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2022cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A crucial issue of current text generation models is that they often uncontrollably generate factually inconsistent text with respective of their inputs. Limited by the lack of annotated data, existing works in evaluating factual consistency directly transfer the reasoning ability of models trained on other data-rich upstream tasks like question answering (QA) and natural language inference (NLI) without any further adaptation. As a result, they perform poorly on the real generated text and are biased heavily by their single-source upstream tasks. To alleviate this problem, we propose a weakly supervised framework that aggregates multiple resources to train a precise and efficient factual metric, namely WeCheck. WeCheck first utilizes a generative model to accurately label a real generated sample by aggregating its weak labels, which are inferred from multiple resources. Then, we train the target metric model with the weak supervision while taking noises into consideration. Comprehensive experiments on a variety of tasks demonstrate the strong performance of WeCheck, which achieves a 3.4% absolute improvement over previous state-of-the-art methods on TRUE benchmark on average.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2022.

Builds on

41 of 53 references.

References · 41

  1. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  4. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
  5. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  6. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
  7. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
  8. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
  9. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
  10. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
  11. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  12. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
29 more
  1. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
  2. 2018Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agentscited by 530
  3. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 407
  4. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 402
  5. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 378
  6. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 372
  7. 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 293
  8. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 287
  9. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  10. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
  11. 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
  12. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 236
  13. 2019Neural Text Summarization: A Critical Evaluationcited by 189
  14. 2018Dialogue Natural Language Inferencecited by 135
  15. 2021Q2: Evaluating Factual Consistency in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues via Question Generation and Question Answeringcited by 132
  16. 2021Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarizationcited by 131
  17. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  18. 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
  19. 2019A Discrete Hard EM Approach for Weakly Supervised Question Answeringcited by 78
  20. 2021DialFact: A Benchmark for Fact-Checking in Dialoguecited by 62
  21. 2020Learning from Rules Generalizing Labeled Exemplarscited by 59
  22. 2017Learning the Structure of Generative Models without Labeled Datacited by 50
  23. 2019The Dialogue Dodecathlon: Open-Domain Knowledge and Image Grounded Conversational Agentscited by 45
  24. 2022Evaluating Factuality in Text Simplificationcited by 34
  25. 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
  26. 2021Does Putting a Linguist in the Loop Improve NLU Data Collection?cited by 29
  27. 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methodscited by 27
  28. 2022FRSUM: Towards Faithful Abstractive Summarization via Enhancing Factual Robustnesscited by 4
  29. 2022Precisely the Point: Adversarial Augmentations for Faithful and Informative Text Generationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Transferable and Efficient Non-Factual Content Detection via Probe Training with Offline Consistency Checking
  2. 2024Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Reliability-Aware Alignment
  3. 2025Verify with Caution: The Pitfalls of Relying on Imperfect Factuality Metrics
  4. 2026Reason and Verify: A Framework for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  5. 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents
  6. 2025AlignCheck: a Semantic Open-Domain Metric for Factual Consistency Assessment
  7. 2026Test-Time Augmentation for LLMs: When Input Diversity Beats Output Diversity at Matched Compute
  8. 2025Latent Self-Consistency for Reliable Majority-Set Selection in Short- and Long-Answer Reasoning