mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pareto Optimal Learning for Estimating Large Language Model Errors

arXiv 2306.16564 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2023cs.CL stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive abilities in many applications. When a concrete and precise answer is desired, it is important to have a quantitative estimation of the potential error rate. However, this can be challenging due to the text-in-text-out nature of generative models. We present a method based on Pareto optimization that generates a risk score to estimate the probability of error in an LLM response by integrating multiple sources of information. We prove theoretically that the error estimator optimized in our framework aligns with the LLM and the information sources in an Pareto optimal manner. Experimental results show that the risk scores estimated by our method are well correlated with the true LLM error rate, thus facilitating error correction. By dynamically combining with prompting strategies such as self-verification and information retrieval, we demonstrate the proposed method can be utilized to increase the performance of an LLM, surpassing state-of-the-art task specific models.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2023.

Builds on

27 of 58 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  7. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  8. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  9. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  10. 2020Domain-Specific Language Model Pretraining for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 996
  11. 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 630
  12. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
15 more
  1. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 304
  3. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  4. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  5. 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
  6. 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 95
  7. 2020Fine-Tuning Pre-trained Language Model with Weak Supervision: A Contrastive-Regularized Self-Training Approachcited by 83
  8. 2020Learning from Rules Generalizing Labeled Exemplarscited by 59
  9. 2023A Brief Report on LawGPT 1.0: A Virtual Legal Assistant Based on GPT-3cited by 46
  10. 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
  11. 2019NERO: A Neural Rule Grounding Framework for Label-Efficient Relation Extractioncited by 24
  12. 2021SAIS: Supervising and Augmenting Intermediate Steps for Document-Level Relation Extractioncited by 23
  13. 2019Multi-Resolution Weak Supervision for Sequential Datacited by 17
  14. 2018Deep Probabilistic Logic: A Unifying Framework for Indirect Supervisioncited by 9
  15. 2020Self-supervised self-supervision by combining deep learning and probabilistic logiccited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

5 papers.