Learning from Interval Targets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of regression with interval targets, where only upper and lower bounds on target values are available in the form of intervals. This problem arises when the exact target label is expensive or impossible to obtain, due to inherent uncertainties. In the absence of exact targets, traditional regression loss functions cannot be used. First, we study the methodology of using a loss functions compatible with interval targets, for which we establish non-asymptotic generalization bounds based on smoothness of the hypothesis class that significantly relaxing prior assumptions of realizability and small ambiguity degree. Second, we propose a novel min-max learning formulation: minimize against the worst-case (maximized) target labels within the provided intervals. The maximization problem in the latter is non-convex, but we show that good performance can be achieved with the incorporation of smoothness constraints. Finally, we perform extensive experiments on real-world datasets and show that our methods achieve state-of-the-art performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.
Builds on
37 of 76 references.
References · 37
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,082
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,621
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,055
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 973
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 581
- 2014Semi-Supervised Learning with Deep Generative Modelscited by 494
- 2019S4L: Self-Supervised Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 335
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
- 2019On Gradient Descent Ascent for Nonconvex-Concave Minimax Problemscited by 266
- 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
- 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
25 more
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
- 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
- 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
- 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
- 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 96
- 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
- 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
- 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
- 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
- 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
- 2018Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 57
- 2019Distribution-Independent PAC Learning of Halfspaces with Massart Noisecited by 54
- 2019Learning with Multiple Complementary Labelscited by 53
- 2021Self-Training with Weak Supervisioncited by 49
- 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
- 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
- 2014PU Learning for Matrix Completioncited by 30
- 2022Label Propagation with Weak Supervisioncited by 9
- 2023Learning with Explanation Constraintscited by 8
- 2020Sample-Specific Output Constraints for Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2023Weakly Supervised Regression with Interval Targetscited by 6
- 2023Partial-Label Regressioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.