mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations

arXiv 2406.14784 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2024cs.LG stat.OTcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We explore an active learning approach for dynamic fair resource allocation problems. Unlike previous work that assumes full feedback from all agents on their allocations, we consider feedback from a select subset of agents at each epoch of the online resource allocation process. Despite this restriction, our proposed algorithms provide regret bounds that are sub-linear in number of time-periods for various measures that include fairness metrics commonly used in resource allocation problems and stability considerations in matching mechanisms. The key insight of our algorithms lies in adaptively identifying the most informative feedback using dueling upper and lower confidence bounds. With this strategy, we show that efficient decision-making does not require extensive feedback and produces efficient outcomes for a variety of problem classes.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.

Builds on

6 of 7 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 54
  2. 2015Online Fair Division: analysing a Food Bank problemcited by 20
  3. 2021Regret, stability & fairness in matching markets with bandit learnerscited by 19
  4. 2019Online Fair Division: A Surveycited by 16
  5. 2020My Fair Bandit: Distributed Learning of Max-Min Fairness with Multi-player Banditscited by 16
  6. 2023Learning Fair Division from Bandit Feedbackcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

3 papers.