mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fail2Drive: Benchmarking Closed-Loop Driving Generalization

arXiv 2604.08535 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2026cs.RO cs.CVcited by 15

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → End-to-end system architecture

Abstract (arXiv)

Generalization under distribution shift remains a central bottleneck for closed-loop autonomous driving. Although simulators like CARLA enable safe and scalable testing, existing benchmarks rarely measure true generalization: they typically reuse training scenarios at test time. Success can therefore reflect memorization rather than robust driving behavior. We introduce Fail2Drive, the first paired-route benchmark for closed-loop generalization in CARLA, with 200 routes and 17 new scenario classes spanning appearance, layout, behavioral, and robustness shifts. Each shifted route is matched with an in-distribution counterpart, isolating the effect of the shift and turning qualitative failures into quantitative diagnostics. Evaluating multiple state-of-the-art models reveals consistent degradation, with an average success-rate drop of 22.8%. Our analysis uncovers unexpected failure modes, such as ignoring objects clearly visible in the LiDAR and failing to learn the fundamental concepts of free and occupied space. To accelerate follow-up work, Fail2Drive includes an open-source toolbox for creating new scenarios and validating solvability via a privileged expert policy. Together, these components establish a reproducible foundation for benchmarking and improving closed-loop driving generalization. We open-source all code, data, and tools at https://github.com/autonomousvision/fail2drive .

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in End-to-end system architecture, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 34 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

Builds on

34 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025PlanT 2.0: Exposing Biases and Structural Flaws in Closed-Loop Driving10 Nov
  2. 2025HiP-AD: Hierarchical and Multi-Granularity Planning with Deformable Attention for Autonomous Driving in a Single Decoder11 Mar
  3. 2024Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Datasets12 Dec
  4. 2024NAVSIM: Data-Driven Non-Reactive Autonomous Vehicle Simulation and Benchmarking21 Jun
  5. 2024Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Driving6 Jun
  6. 2023Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Models13 Jun
  7. 2022Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baseline16 Jun
  8. 2022TransFuser: Imitation with Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving31 May
  9. 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehicles22 Jun

Other references · 25

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  2. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  3. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,068
  4. 2023DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answeringcited by 527
  5. 2019Exploring the Limitations of Behavior Cloning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 343
  6. 2025AutoVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Reasoning and Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 252
  7. 2025ORION: A Holistic End-to-End Autonomous Driving Framework by Vision-Language Instructed Action Generationcited by 177
  8. 2021NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 174
  9. 2025SimLingo: Vision-Only Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving with Language-Action Alignmentcited by 149
  10. 2022Learning from All Vehiclescited by 135
  11. 2021LookOut: Diverse Multi-Future Prediction and Planning for Self-Drivingcited by 96
  12. 2025Cosmos-Transfer1: Conditional World Generation with Adaptive Multimodal Controlcited by 95
13 more
  1. 2024ChatScene: Knowledge-Enabled Safety-Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 92
  2. 2024HUGSIM: A Real-Time, Photo-Realistic and Closed-Loop Simulator for Autonomous Drivingcited by 84
  3. 2022SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 65
  4. 2025Robust Autonomy Emerges from Self-Playcited by 64
  5. 2018On Offline Evaluation of Vision-based Driving Modelscited by 62
  6. 2024NeuroNCAP: Photorealistic Closed-loop Safety Testing for Autonomous Drivingcited by 61
  7. 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving against Real-World Adversarial Patch Attackscited by 55
  8. 2022DTA: Physical Camouflage Attacks using Differentiable Transformation Networkcited by 51
  9. 2024Can Vehicle Motion Planning Generalize to Realistic Long-tail Scenarios?cited by 38
  10. 2025CaRL: Learning Scalable Planning Policies with Simple Rewardscited by 34
  11. 2022Two Video Data Sets for Tracking and Retrieval of Out of Distribution Objectscited by 19
  12. 2020CARLA Real Traffic Scenarios -- novel training ground and benchmark for autonomous drivingcited by 8
  13. 2024UrbanCAD: Towards Highly Controllable and Photorealistic 3D Vehicles for Urban Scene Simulationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 15.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Safety2Drive: Safety-Critical Scenario Benchmark for the Evaluation of Autonomous Driving
  2. 2026HiDrive: A Closed-Loop Benchmark for High-Level Autonomous Driving
  3. 2026BridgeSim: Unveiling the OL-CL Gap in End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  4. 2026DriveHierarchy: A Benchmark for Diagnosing VLM Driving Capabilities from Open-Loop Understanding to Closed-Loop Execution
  5. 2026Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems
  6. 2026DriveSafer: End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Safety Guidance
  7. 2026DriveVer: Lightweight Trajectory Evaluator as Test-Time Verifier for Autonomous Driving
  8. 2022Driver Dojo: A Benchmark for Generalizable Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving