Herding End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Neuro-Symbolic Safety Guards
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern end-to-end driving agents can achieve high average performance yet still violate basic traffic rules that a human driver would never miss. The reason is structural: they learn statistical patterns rather than the physical conditions that guarantee safe driving, leaving their decision-making process opaque and safety constraints unenforced. We introduce a neuro-symbolic safety guard, a lightweight module that attaches to the final command interface of an already-trained agent. Immediately before a command reaches the vehicle, it checks the command against explicit safety rules and, only when necessary, replaces it with the nearest safe alternative. Each intervention is directly executable and traceable to the rule that triggered it, while the guard itself requires no retraining and adds no learned component. Evaluated on the long-tail benchmarks Fail2Drive and Bench2Drive using the state-of-the-art TransFuser v6 (TFv6) as a case study, the guard improves Success Rate by 15% and reduces safety-critical collisions by up to 53%, while preserving the original Driving Score.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.
Builds on
18 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 17
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 588
- 2017End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learningcited by 479
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2021Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 372
- 2022Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baselinecited by 247
- 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
- 2022Safety-Enhanced Autonomous Driving Using Interpretable Sensor Fusion Transformercited by 211
- 2025Alpamayo-R1: Bridging Reasoning and Action Prediction for Generalizable Autonomous Driving in the Long Tailcited by 136
- 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 129
- 2017OptLayer - Practical Constrained Optimization for Deep Reinforcement Learning in the Real Worldcited by 64
- 2025LEAD: Minimizing Learner-Expert Asymmetry in End-to-End Drivingcited by 22
5 more
- 2022MMFN: Multi-Modal-Fusion-Net for End-to-End Drivingcited by 17
- 2025BridgeDrive: Diffusion Bridge Policy for Closed-Loop Trajectory Planning in Autonomous Drivingcited by 17
- 2026Fail2Drive: Benchmarking Closed-Loop Driving Generalizationcited by 15
- 2025PlanT 2.0: Exposing Biases and Structural Flaws in Closed-Loop Drivingcited by 8
- 2026What Matters for Scalable and Robust Learning in End-to-End Driving Planners?cited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026GuardAD: Safeguarding Autonomous Driving MLLMs via Markovian Safety Logic
- 2023Towards Safe Autonomous Driving Policies using a Neuro-Symbolic Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach
- 2026DriveSafer: End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Safety Guidance
- 2019Safer End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Conditional Imitation Learning and Command Augmentation
- 2026Neuro-Symbolic Drive: Rule-Grounded Faithful Reasoning for Driving VLAs
- 2021SafetyNet: Safe planning for real-world self-driving vehicles using machine-learned policies
- 2021Weakly Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Highway Driving via Virtual Safety Cages
- 2023Neurosymbolic Meta-Reinforcement Lookahead Learning Achieves Safe Self-Driving in Non-Stationary Environments