Networked Communication for Decentralised Agents in Mean-Field Games
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Methods like multi-agent reinforcement learning struggle to scale with growing population size. Mean-field games (MFGs) are a game-theoretic approach that can circumvent this by finding a solution for an abstract infinite population, which can then be used as an approximate solution for the N-agent problem. However, classical mean-field algorithms usually only work under restrictive conditions. We take steps to address this by introducing networked communication to MFGs, in particular to settings that use a single, non-episodic run of N decentralised agents to simulate the infinite population, as is likely to be most reasonable in real-world deployments. We prove that our architecture's sample guarantees lie between those of earlier theoretical algorithms for the centralised- and independent-learning architectures, varying dependent on network structure and the number of communication rounds. However, the sample guarantees of the three theoretical algorithms do not actually result in practical convergence times. We thus contribute practical enhancements to all three algorithms allowing us to present their first empirical demonstrations. We then show that in practical settings where the theoretical hyperparameters are not observed, giving fewer loops but poorer estimation of the Q-function, our communication scheme still respects the earlier theoretical analysis: it considerably accelerates learning over the independent case, which hardly seems to learn at all, and often performs similarly to the centralised case, while removing the restrictive assumption of the latter. We provide ablations and additional studies showing that our networked approach also has advantages over both alternatives in terms of robustness to update failures and to changes in population size.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 68 of its 209 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.
Builds on
68 of 209 references.
References · 68
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
- 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
- 2016Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 301
- 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
- 2018Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 202
- 2018Fully Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Networked Agentscited by 189
- 2020Revisiting Fundamentals of Experience Replaycited by 171
- 2021Distributed Learning in Wireless Networks: Recent Progress and Future Challengescited by 125
- 2017A Deeper Look at Experience Replaycited by 104
- 2017MAgent: A Many-Agent Reinforcement Learning Platform for Artificial Collective Intelligencecited by 69
- 2020Munchausen Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
38 more
- 2021Approximately Solving Mean Field Games via Entropy-Regularized Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2018Emergent Communication through Negotiationcited by 62
- 2020Fictitious Play for Mean Field Games: Continuous Time Analysis and Applicationscited by 57
- 2019Model-Free Mean-Field Reinforcement Learning: Mean-Field MDP and Mean-Field Q-Learningcited by 56
- 2022Learning in Mean Field Games: A Surveycited by 56
- 2021Concave Utility Reinforcement Learning: the Mean-Field Game Viewpointcited by 54
- 2020Entropy Regularization for Mean Field Games with Learningcited by 50
- 2020Social diversity and social preferences in mixed-motive reinforcement learningcited by 49
- 2020Pipeline PSRO: A Scalable Approach for Finding Approximate Nash Equilibria in Large Gamescited by 47
- 2019On the Convergence of Model Free Learning in Mean Field Gamescited by 45
- 2020Unified Reinforcement Q-Learning for Mean Field Game and Control Problemscited by 42
- 2018Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Double Averaging Primal-Dual Optimizationcited by 40
- 2020Q-Learning in Regularized Mean-field Gamescited by 40
- 2015Learning in Mean Field Games: the Fictitious Playcited by 37
- 2022Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Mean Field Gamescited by 33
- 2021Mean Field Games Flock! The Reinforcement Learning Waycited by 30
- 2016Markov-Nash Equilibria in Mean-Field Games with Discounted Costcited by 29
- 2021Scaling up Mean Field Games with Online Mirror Descentcited by 29
- 2021Generalization in Mean Field Games by Learning Master Policiescited by 28
- 2020Multi Type Mean Field Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
- 2019Deep Learning Methods for Mean Field Control Problems with Delaycited by 24
- 2020A General Framework for Learning Mean-Field Gamescited by 24
- 2022Policy Mirror Ascent for Efficient and Independent Learning in Mean Field Gamescited by 24
- 2019Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Networked Agents: Recent Advancescited by 23
- 2020Mean Field Games and Applications: Numerical Aspectscited by 22
- 2020Simple and optimal methods for stochastic variational inequalities, II: Markovian noise and policy evaluation in reinforcement learningcited by 22
- 2019A Multi-Agent Off-Policy Actor-Critic Algorithm for Distributed Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2021Numerical Methods for Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Controlcited by 21
- 2021Deep Learning for Mean Field Games and Mean Field Control with Applications to Financecited by 20
- 2018Decentralised Learning in Systems with Many, Many Strategic Agentscited by 19
- 2019Numerical resolution of McKean-Vlasov FBSDEs using neural networkscited by 19
- 2020Breaking the Curse of Many Agents: Provable Mean Embedding Q-Iteration for Mean-Field Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
- 2019A Communication-Efficient Multi-Agent Actor-Critic Algorithm for Distributed Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2020Stable Policy Optimization via Off-Policy Divergence Regularizationcited by 16
- 2020Partially Observable Mean Field Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2022Oracle-free Reinforcement Learning in Mean-Field Games along a Single Sample Pathcited by 16
- 2019Actor-Critic Provably Finds Nash Equilibria of Linear-Quadratic Mean-Field Gamescited by 15
- 2021Divergence-Regularized Multi-Agent Actor-Criticcited by 15
50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.