mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized Manipulation

arXiv 2305.16501 ↗First posted 25 May 2023cs.LG cs.GTcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the fundamental mistake bound and sample complexity in the strategic classification, where agents can strategically manipulate their feature vector up to an extent in order to be predicted as positive. For example, given a classifier determining college admission, student candidates may try to take easier classes to improve their GPA, retake SAT and change schools in an effort to fool the classifier. Ball manipulations are a widely studied class of manipulations in the literature, where agents can modify their feature vector within a bounded radius ball. Unlike most prior work, our work considers manipulations to be personalized, meaning that agents can have different levels of manipulation abilities (e.g., varying radii for ball manipulations), and unknown to the learner. We formalize the learning problem in an interaction model where the learner first deploys a classifier and the agent manipulates the feature vector within their manipulation set to game the deployed classifier. We investigate various scenarios in terms of the information available to the learner during the interaction, such as observing the original feature vector before or after deployment, observing the manipulated feature vector, or not seeing either the original or the manipulated feature vector. We begin by providing online mistake bounds and PAC sample complexity in these scenarios for ball manipulations. We also explore non-ball manipulations and show that, even in the simplest scenario where both the original and the manipulated feature vectors are revealed, the mistake bounds and sample complexity are lower bounded by Omega(|H|) when the target function belongs to a known class H.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2023.

Builds on

15 of 27 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 257
  2. 2017Strategic Classification from Revealed Preferencescited by 128
  3. 2018The Social Cost of Strategic Classificationcited by 105
  4. 2018How Do Classifiers Induce Agents To Invest Effort Strategically?cited by 83
  5. 2019VC Classes are Adversarially Robustly Learnable, but Only Improperlycited by 83
  6. 2018The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulationcited by 75
  7. 2021Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?cited by 53
  8. 2020PAC-Learning for Strategic Classificationcited by 50
  9. 2020The Strategic Perceptroncited by 48
  10. 2021Alternative Microfoundations for Strategic Classificationcited by 47
  11. 2020Maximizing Welfare with Incentive-Aware Evaluation Mechanismscited by 46
  12. 2022Learning in Stackelberg Games with Non-myopic Agentscited by 29
3 more
  1. 2022On classification of strategic agents who can both game and improvecited by 27
  2. 2022Learning Losses for Strategic Classificationcited by 22
  3. 2023Fundamental Bounds on Online Strategic Classificationcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 8; 2025: 7; 2026: 7.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Learnability Gaps of Strategic Classificationcited by 16
  2. 2023One-Shot Strategic Classification Under Unknown Costscited by 13
  3. 2024Non-linear Welfare-Aware Strategic Learningcited by 12
  4. 2024Strategic Littlestone Dimension: Improved Bounds on Online Strategic Classificationcited by 8
  5. 2024Classification Under Strategic Self-Selectioncited by 7
  6. 2024Algorithmic Decision-Making under Agents with Persistent Improvementcited by 7
  7. 2024Who's Gaming the System? A Causally-Motivated Approach for Detecting Strategic Adaptationcited by 5
  8. 2025How Strategic Agents Respond: Comparing Analytical Models with LLM-Generated Responses in Strategic Classificationcited by 5
  9. 2025Incentive-Aware Machine Learning; Robustness, Fairness, Improvement & Causalitycited by 5
  10. 2025Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification?cited by 5
  11. 2024Minimax Group Fairness in Strategic Classificationcited by 4
  12. 2025Strategic Classification with Non-Linear Classifierscited by 4
12 more
  1. 2023Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Strategic Buyerscited by 3
  2. 2024Practical Performative Policy Learning with Strategic Agentscited by 3
  3. 2025Learning Classifiers That Induce Marketscited by 3
  4. 2025Anticipating Gaming to Incentivize Improvement: Guiding Agents in (Fair) Strategic Classificationcited by 2
  5. 2025Explanation Design in Strategic Learning: Sufficient Explanations that Induce Non-harmful Responsescited by 1
  6. 2026When Tabular Foundation Models Meet Strategic Tabular Data: A Prior Alignment Approachcited by 1
  7. 2026On Randomized Algorithms in Online Strategic Classificationcited by 0
  8. 2026Strategic PAC Learnability via Geometric Definabilitycited by 0
  9. 2026Partial Fairness Awareness: Belief-Guided Strategic Mechanism for Strategic Agentscited by 0
  10. 2026Linear Strategic Classification with Endogenous Improvementscited by 0
  11. 2026Ambiguous Strategic Classificationcited by 0
  12. 2026Robust Strategic Classification under Decision-Dependent Cost Uncertaintycited by 0