Robust Strategic Classification under Decision-Dependent Cost Uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Humans facing algorithmic decision systems have been found to ``game'' them by altering their input data (at a cost to them) in order to favorably change the algorithmic outcomes they receive (at a cost to the algorithm). The growing literature on strategic classification seeks to develop robust machine learning algorithms that account for, and reduce, unwanted strategic behavior. A limitation of these existing works is that they assume the cost of strategic behavior to be fixed and independent of the classifier's decision. In practice, however, manipulation costs evolve and depend on past algorithmic decisions: today's decisions influence tomorrow's costs. This paper proposes and analyzes a two-stage robust optimization framework with a decision-dependent uncertainty set to capture such dependencies. We highlight that awareness of policy-dependent costs not only reduces uncertainty, but also better curtails gaming of the algorithmic system over time.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
36 of 69 references.
References · 36
- 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 257
- 2017Strategic Classification from Revealed Preferencescited by 128
- 2020Combining Deep Reinforcement Learning and Search for Imperfect-Information Gamescited by 114
- 2018The Social Cost of Strategic Classificationcited by 105
- 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
- 2021Strategic Classification in the Darkcited by 66
- 2020PAC-Learning for Strategic Classificationcited by 50
- 2020The Strategic Perceptroncited by 48
- 2020Maximizing Welfare with Incentive-Aware Evaluation Mechanismscited by 46
- 2020The Role of Randomness and Noise in Strategic Classificationcited by 40
- 2022Generalized Strategic Classification and the Case of Aligned Incentivescited by 34
- 2021Stateful Strategic Regressioncited by 32
24 more
- 2023Causal Strategic Classification: A Tale of Two Shiftscited by 30
- 2023Calibrated Stackelberg Games: Learning Optimal Commitments Against Calibrated Agentscited by 25
- 2018SCORES: Shape Composition with Recursive Substructure Priorscited by 24
- 2023Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized Manipulationcited by 24
- 2019Optimal Decision Making Under Strategic Behaviorcited by 20
- 2020Manipulation-Proof Machine Learningcited by 20
- 2024Learnability Gaps of Strategic Classificationcited by 16
- 2020Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Bayesian Stackelberg Markov Games for Adaptive Moving Target Defensecited by 15
- 2021Bayesian Persuasion for Algorithmic Recoursecited by 14
- 2023One-Shot Strategic Classification Under Unknown Costscited by 13
- 2024Bayesian Strategic Classificationcited by 13
- 2024The Double-Edged Sword of Behavioral Responses in Strategic Classification: Theory and User Studiescited by 9
- 2020Algorithmic Transparency with Strategic Userscited by 8
- 2024Learning under Imitative Strategic Behavior with Unforeseeable Outcomescited by 8
- 2025Incentivizing Desirable Effort Profiles in Strategic Classification: The Role of Causality and Uncertaintycited by 8
- 2022Setting Fair Incentives to Maximize Improvementcited by 7
- 2022Bootstrapping the Relationship Between Images and Their Clean and Noisy Labelscited by 7
- 2024Breaking the Curse of Multiagency in Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2025Decision-Dependent Stochastic Optimization: The Role of Distribution Dynamicscited by 6
- 2025Strategic Classification with Randomised Classifierscited by 4
- 2025Strategic Classification with Non-Linear Classifierscited by 4
- 2025Learning Classifiers That Induce Marketscited by 3
- 2022Robust Generation Dispatch with Strategic Renewable Power Curtailment and Decision-Dependent Uncertaintycited by 2
- 2022Two-Stage Robust Optimization with Decision Dependent Uncertaintycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.