mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Strategic PAC Learnability via Geometric Definability

arXiv 2605.13426 ↗First posted 13 May 2026cs.LG math.AGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Strategic classification studies learning settings in which individuals can modify their features, at a cost, in order to influence the classifier's decision. A central question is how the sample complexity of the induced (strategic) hypothesis class depends on the complexities of the underlying hypothesis class and the cost structure governing feasible manipulations. Prior work has shown that in several natural settings, such as linear classifiers with norm costs, the induced complexity can be controlled. We begin by showing that such guarantees fail in general - even in simple cases: there exist hypothesis classes of VC dimension 1 on the real line such that, even under the simplest interval neighborhoods, the induced class has infinite VC dimension. Thus, strategic behavior can turn an easy learning problem into a non-learnable one. To overcome this, we introduce structure via a geometric definability assumption: both the hypothesis class and the cost-induced neighborhood relation can be defined by first-order formulas over ℝ_mathttexp. Intuitively, this means that hypotheses and costs can be described using arithmetic operations, exponentiation, logarithms, and comparisons. This captures a broad range of natural classes and cost functions, including ℓp distances, Wasserstein distance, and information-theoretic divergences. Under this assumption, we prove that learnability is preserved, with sample complexity controlled by the complexity of the defining formulas.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 57 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Nearly-tight VC-dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networkscited by 311
  2. 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 257
  3. 2019Strategic Classification is Causal Modeling in Disguisecited by 92
  4. 2019VC Classes are Adversarially Robustly Learnable, but Only Improperlycited by 83
  5. 2015The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learningcited by 72
  6. 2021Strategic Classification in the Darkcited by 66
  7. 2020Causal Strategic Linear Regressioncited by 65
  8. 2020Proper Learning, Helly Number, and an Optimal SVM Boundcited by 53
  9. 2020PAC-Learning for Strategic Classificationcited by 50
  10. 2021Information Discrepancy in Strategic Learningcited by 48
  11. 2022Generalized Strategic Classification and the Case of Aligned Incentivescited by 34
  12. 2023Causal Strategic Classification: A Tale of Two Shiftscited by 30
7 more
  1. 2015Refined Error Bounds for Several Learning Algorithmscited by 25
  2. 2023Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized Manipulationcited by 24
  3. 2022Learning Losses for Strategic Classificationcited by 22
  4. 2024Learnability Gaps of Strategic Classificationcited by 16
  5. 2023Optimal Sample Complexity of Contrastive Learningcited by 15
  6. 2023One-Shot Strategic Classification Under Unknown Costscited by 13
  7. 2025Strategic Classification with Non-Linear Classifierscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.