Minimax Group Fairness in Strategic Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In strategic classification, agents manipulate their features, at a cost, to receive a positive classification outcome from the learner's classifier. The goal of the learner in such settings is to learn a classifier that is robust to strategic manipulations. While the majority of works in this domain consider accuracy as the primary objective of the learner, in this work, we consider learning objectives that have group fairness guarantees in addition to accuracy guarantees. We work with the minimax group fairness notion that asks for minimizing the maximal group error rate across population groups. We formalize a fairness-aware Stackelberg game between a population of agents consisting of several groups, with each group having its own cost function, and a learner in the agnostic PAC setting in which the learner is working with a hypothesis class H. When the cost functions of the agents are separable, we show the existence of an efficient algorithm that finds an approximately optimal deterministic classifier for the learner when the number of groups is small. This algorithm remains efficient, both statistically and computationally, even when H is the set of all classifiers. We then consider cost functions that are not necessarily separable and show the existence of oracle-efficient algorithms that find approximately optimal randomized classifiers for the learner when H has finite strategic VC dimension. These algorithms work under the assumption that the learner is fully transparent: the learner draws a classifier from its distribution (randomized classifier) before the agents respond by manipulating their feature vectors. We highlight the effectiveness of such transparency in developing oracle-efficient algorithms. We conclude with verifying the efficacy of our algorithms on real data by conducting an experimental analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2024.
Builds on
19 of 44 references.
References · 19
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 256
- 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
- 2017Strategic Classification from Revealed Preferencescited by 126
- 2018The Social Cost of Strategic Classificationcited by 105
- 2018The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulationcited by 75
- 2018The Price of Fair PCA: One Extra Dimensioncited by 67
- 2020PAC-Learning for Strategic Classificationcited by 50
- 2020The Strategic Perceptroncited by 48
- 2020Fair clustering via equitable group representationscited by 43
- 2020The Role of Randomness and Noise in Strategic Classificationcited by 40
7 more
- 2021Approximation Algorithms for Socially Fair Clusteringcited by 25
- 2023Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized Manipulationcited by 23
- 2023Fundamental Bounds on Online Strategic Classificationcited by 17
- 2024Learnability Gaps of Strategic Classificationcited by 16
- 2021Unfairness Despite Awareness: Group-Fair Classification with Strategic Agentscited by 9
- 2022Addressing Strategic Manipulation Disparities in Fair Classificationcited by 8
- 2020Algorithms and Learning for Fair Portfolio Designcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2026Safe Fairness Guarantees Without Demographics in Classification: Spectral Uncertainty Set Perspectivecited by 1
- 2025Algorithmic Fairness: Not a Purely Technical but Socio-Technical Propertycited by 0
- 2026Individual Fairness In Strategic Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Partial Fairness Awareness: Belief-Guided Strategic Mechanism for Strategic Agentscited by 0
- 2026Partial Fairness Awareness: Belief-Guided Strategic Mechanism for Strategic Agents30 May 2026
- 2026Safe Fairness Guarantees Without Demographics in Classification: Spectral Uncertainty Set Perspective12 Feb 2026
- 2026Individual Fairness In Strategic Classification4 Feb 2026
- 2025Algorithmic Fairness: Not a Purely Technical but Socio-Technical Property14 Jun 2025