mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Strategic Littlestone Dimension: Improved Bounds on Online Strategic Classification

arXiv 2407.11619 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.GTcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of online binary classification in settings where strategic agents can modify their observable features to receive a positive classification. We model the set of feasible manipulations by a directed graph over the feature space, and assume the learner only observes the manipulated features instead of the original ones. We introduce the Strategic Littlestone Dimension, a new combinatorial measure that captures the joint complexity of the hypothesis class and the manipulation graph. We demonstrate that it characterizes the instance-optimal mistake bounds for deterministic learning algorithms in the realizable setting. We also achieve improved regret in the agnostic setting by a refined agnostic-to-realizable reduction that accounts for the additional challenge of not observing agents' original features. Finally, we relax the assumption that the learner knows the manipulation graph, instead assuming their knowledge is captured by a family of graphs. We derive regret bounds in both the realizable setting where all agents manipulate according to the same graph within the graph family, and the agnostic setting where the manipulation graphs are chosen adversarially and not consistently modeled by a single graph in the family.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2024.

Builds on

17 of 29 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Performative Predictioncited by 318
  2. 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 256
  3. 2017Strategic Classification from Revealed Preferencescited by 126
  4. 2018How Do Classifiers Induce Agents To Invest Effort Strategically?cited by 82
  5. 2018The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulationcited by 75
  6. 2021Strategic Classification in the Darkcited by 66
  7. 2020PAC-Learning for Strategic Classificationcited by 50
  8. 2020The Strategic Perceptroncited by 48
  9. 2020Maximizing Welfare with Incentive-Aware Evaluation Mechanismscited by 46
  10. 2022On classification of strategic agents who can both game and improvecited by 27
  11. 2023Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized Manipulationcited by 23
  12. 2022Learning Losses for Strategic Classificationcited by 22
5 more
  1. 2023Fundamental Bounds on Online Strategic Classificationcited by 17
  2. 2024Learnability Gaps of Strategic Classificationcited by 16
  3. 2023Multiclass Online Learnability under Bandit Feedbackcited by 12
  4. 2024Bandit-Feedback Online Multiclass Classification: Variants and Tradeoffscited by 9
  5. 2023Sequential Strategic Screeningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.