mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Strategic Perceptron

arXiv 2008.01710 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2020cs.LG cs.GT stat.MLcited by 48

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The classical Perceptron algorithm provides a simple and elegant procedure for learning a linear classifier. In each step, the algorithm observes the sample's position and label and updates the current predictor accordingly if it makes a mistake. However, in presence of strategic agents that desire to be classified as positive and that are able to modify their position by a limited amount, the classifier may not be able to observe the true position of agents but rather a position where the agent pretends to be. Unlike the original setting with perfect knowledge of positions, in this situation the Perceptron algorithm fails to achieve its guarantees, and we illustrate examples with the predictor oscillating between two solutions forever, making an unbounded number of mistakes even though a perfect large-margin linear classifier exists. Our main contribution is providing a modified Perceptron-style algorithm which makes a bounded number of mistakes in presence of strategic agents with both ℓ2 and weighted ℓ1 manipulation costs. In our baseline model, knowledge of the manipulation costs (i.e., the extent to which an agent may manipulate) is assumed. In our most general model, we relax this assumption and provide an algorithm which learns and refines both the classifier and its cost estimates to achieve good mistake bounds even when manipulation costs are unknown.

Key facts. Cited by 48 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 7; 2023: 8; 2024: 9; 2025: 12; 2026: 6.

48 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Strategic Classification in the Darkcited by 66
  2. 2021Strategic Classification Made Practicalcited by 58
  3. 2021Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?cited by 53
  4. 2021Information Discrepancy in Strategic Learningcited by 48
  5. 2021Stateful Strategic Regressioncited by 32
  6. 2023Causal Strategic Classification: A Tale of Two Shiftscited by 30
  7. 2022On classification of strategic agents who can both game and improvecited by 27
  8. 2023Calibrated Stackelberg Games: Learning Optimal Commitments Against Calibrated Agentscited by 25
  9. 2023Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized Manipulationcited by 23
  10. 2023Fundamental Bounds on Online Strategic Classificationcited by 17
  11. 2024Learnability Gaps of Strategic Classificationcited by 16
  12. 2023One-Shot Strategic Classification Under Unknown Costscited by 13
36 more
  1. 2024Bayesian Strategic Classificationcited by 12
  2. 2024Non-linear Welfare-Aware Strategic Learningcited by 12
  3. 2023Strategic Apple Tastingcited by 10
  4. 2022Strategic Decision-Making in the Presence of Information Asymmetry: Provably Efficient RL with Algorithmic Instrumentscited by 9
  5. 2024Automating Data Annotation under Strategic Human Agents: Risks and Potential Solutionscited by 9
  6. 2024The Double-Edged Sword of Behavioral Responses in Strategic Classification: Theory and User Studiescited by 9
  7. 2023Sequential Strategic Screeningcited by 8
  8. 2024Learning under Imitative Strategic Behavior with Unforeseeable Outcomescited by 8
  9. 2024Strategic Littlestone Dimension: Improved Bounds on Online Strategic Classificationcited by 8
  10. 2025Incentivizing Desirable Effort Profiles in Strategic Classification: The Role of Causality and Uncertaintycited by 8
  11. 2022Setting Fair Incentives to Maximize Improvementcited by 7
  12. 2024Algorithmic Decision-Making under Agents with Persistent Improvementcited by 7
  13. 2021Combinatorial Bandits under Strategic Manipulationscited by 6
  14. 2025PAC Learning with Improvementscited by 6
  15. 2025Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification?cited by 5
  16. 2022Strategyproof Decision-Making in Panel Data Settings and Beyondcited by 4
  17. 2024Minimax Group Fairness in Strategic Classificationcited by 4
  18. 2025How Strategic Agents Respond: Comparing Analytical Models with LLM-Generated Responses in Strategic Classificationcited by 4
  19. 2025Strategic Classification with Non-Linear Classifierscited by 4
  20. 2025Learning Classifiers That Induce Marketscited by 3
  21. 2025Incentive-Aware Machine Learning; Robustness, Fairness, Improvement & Causalitycited by 3
  22. 2022Provably Accurate and Scalable Linear Classifiers in Hyperbolic Spacescited by 2
  23. 2022The Equity Framework: Fairness Beyond Equalized Predictive Outcomescited by 2
  24. 2023Discovering Optimal Scoring Mechanisms in Causal Strategic Predictioncited by 2
  25. 2025Anticipating Gaming to Incentivize Improvement: Guiding Agents in (Fair) Strategic Classificationcited by 2
  26. 2025Conservative classifiers do consistently well with improving agents: characterizing statistical and online learningcited by 2
  27. 2025Explanation Design in Strategic Learning: Sufficient Explanations that Induce Non-harmful Responsescited by 1
  28. 2025The Disparate Effects of Partial Information in Bayesian Strategic Learningcited by 1
  29. 2025The Active and Noise-Tolerant Strategic Perceptroncited by 1
  30. 2026The Role of Causal Features in Strategic Classification for Robustness and Alignmentcited by 1
  31. 2022A note on the complex and bicomplex valued neural networkscited by 0
  32. 2026On Randomized Algorithms in Online Strategic Classificationcited by 0
  33. 2026Linear Strategic Classification with Endogenous Improvementscited by 0
  34. 2026Ambiguous Strategic Classificationcited by 0
  35. 2026Robust Strategic Classification under Decision-Dependent Cost Uncertaintycited by 0
  36. 2026Strategic Classification Has a Missing Lever: Audit Riskcited by 0