mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Maximizing Welfare with Incentive-Aware Evaluation Mechanisms

arXiv 2011.01956 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2020cs.GT cs.AIcited by 46

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by applications such as college admission and insurance rate determination, we propose an evaluation problem where the inputs are controlled by strategic individuals who can modify their features at a cost. A learner can only partially observe the features, and aims to classify individuals with respect to a quality score. The goal is to design an evaluation mechanism that maximizes the overall quality score, i.e., welfare, in the population, taking any strategic updating into account. We further study the algorithmic aspect of finding the welfare maximizing evaluation mechanism under two specific settings in our model. When scores are linear and mechanisms use linear scoring rules on the observable features, we show that the optimal evaluation mechanism is an appropriate projection of the quality score. When mechanisms must use linear thresholds, we design a polynomial time algorithm with a (1/4)-approximation guarantee when the underlying feature distribution is sufficiently smooth and admits an oracle for finding dense regions. We extend our results to settings where the prior distribution is unknown and must be learned from samples.

Key facts. Cited by 46 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 9; 2025: 7; 2026: 10.

46 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Outside the Echo Chamber: Optimizing the Performative Riskcited by 95
  2. 2021Strategic Classification in the Darkcited by 66
  3. 2021Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?cited by 53
  4. 2021Information Discrepancy in Strategic Learningcited by 48
  5. 2021Alternative Microfoundations for Strategic Classificationcited by 47
  6. 2023Causal Strategic Classification: A Tale of Two Shiftscited by 30
  7. 2022On classification of strategic agents who can both game and improvecited by 27
  8. 2023Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized Manipulationcited by 23
  9. 2021Auctions Between Regret-Minimizing Agentscited by 22
  10. 2022Learning Losses for Strategic Classificationcited by 22
  11. 2021Strategic Rankingcited by 21
  12. 2021How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning Agentscited by 17
34 more
  1. 2023Fundamental Bounds on Online Strategic Classificationcited by 17
  2. 2024Learnability Gaps of Strategic Classificationcited by 16
  3. 2023Performative Federated Learning: A Solution to Model-Dependent and Heterogeneous Distribution Shiftscited by 14
  4. 2024Clickbait vs. Quality: How Engagement-Based Optimization Shapes the Content Landscape in Online Platformscited by 13
  5. 2024Bayesian Strategic Classificationcited by 12
  6. 2021Model Transferability With Responsive Decision Subjectscited by 9
  7. 2024Automating Data Annotation under Strategic Human Agents: Risks and Potential Solutionscited by 9
  8. 2023Sequential Strategic Screeningcited by 8
  9. 2024Learning under Imitative Strategic Behavior with Unforeseeable Outcomescited by 8
  10. 2024Strategic Littlestone Dimension: Improved Bounds on Online Strategic Classificationcited by 8
  11. 2025Performative Validity of Recourse Explanationscited by 8
  12. 2022Setting Fair Incentives to Maximize Improvementcited by 7
  13. 2024Strategic Classification With Externalitiescited by 7
  14. 2025PAC Learning with Improvementscited by 6
  15. 2025Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification?cited by 5
  16. 2024Practical Performative Policy Learning with Strategic Agentscited by 3
  17. 2025Incentive-Aware Machine Learning; Robustness, Fairness, Improvement & Causalitycited by 3
  18. 2021Automated Mechanism Design for Classification with Partial Verificationcited by 2
  19. 2023Operationalizing Counterfactual Metrics: Incentives, Ranking, and Information Asymmetrycited by 2
  20. 2025Anticipating Gaming to Incentivize Improvement: Guiding Agents in (Fair) Strategic Classificationcited by 2
  21. 2025Conservative classifiers do consistently well with improving agents: characterizing statistical and online learningcited by 2
  22. 2025Strategic Filtering for Content Moderation: Free Speech or Free of Distortion?cited by 1
  23. 2026Multi-Level Strategic Classification: Incentivizing Improvement through Promotion and Relegation Dynamicscited by 1
  24. 2026Beyond Rational Illusion: Behaviorally Realistic Strategic Classificationcited by 1
  25. 2026The Role of Causality in Algorithmic Recoursecited by 1
  26. 2021Eliciting Truthful Reports with Partial Signals in Repeated Gamescited by 0
  27. 2024Score Design for Multi-Criteria Incentivizationcited by 0
  28. 2026On Randomized Algorithms in Online Strategic Classificationcited by 0
  29. 2026Online Learning with Improving Agents: Multiclass, Budgeted Agents and Bandit Learnerscited by 0
  30. 2026Sequential Strategic Classification with Multi-Stage Selective Classifierscited by 0
  31. 2026Partial Fairness Awareness: Belief-Guided Strategic Mechanism for Strategic Agentscited by 0
  32. 2026Linear Strategic Classification with Endogenous Improvementscited by 0
  33. 2026Robust Strategic Classification under Decision-Dependent Cost Uncertaintycited by 0
  34. 2026Strategic Classification Has a Missing Lever: Audit Riskcited by 0