mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Moving Forward by Moving Backward: Embedding Action Impact over Action Semantics

arXiv 2304.12289 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A common assumption when training embodied agents is that the impact of taking an action is stable; for instance, executing the "move ahead" action will always move the agent forward by a fixed distance, perhaps with some small amount of actuator-induced noise. This assumption is limiting; an agent may encounter settings that dramatically alter the impact of actions: a move ahead action on a wet floor may send the agent twice as far as it expects and using the same action with a broken wheel might transform the expected translation into a rotation. Instead of relying that the impact of an action stably reflects its pre-defined semantic meaning, we propose to model the impact of actions on-the-fly using latent embeddings. By combining these latent action embeddings with a novel, transformer-based, policy head, we design an Action Adaptive Policy (AAP). We evaluate our AAP on two challenging visual navigation tasks in the AI2-THOR and Habitat environments and show that our AAP is highly performant even when faced, at inference-time with missing actions and, previously unseen, perturbed action space. Moreover, we observe significant improvement in robustness against these actions when evaluating in real-world scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2023.

Builds on

59 of 71 references.

References · 59

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
  7. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
  8. 2019Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Researchcited by 1,163
  9. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  10. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
  11. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
  12. 2018On Evaluation of Embodied Navigation Agentscited by 526
38 more
  1. 2021Habitat 2.0: Training Home Assistants to Rearrange their Habitatcited by 501
  2. 2021RMA: Rapid Motor Adaptation for Legged Robotscited by 430
  3. 2020Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Groundingcited by 401
  4. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
  5. 2022ProcTHOR: Large-Scale Embodied AI Using Procedural Generationcited by 369
  6. 2019DD-PPO: Learning Near-Perfect PointGoal Navigators from 2.5 Billion Framescited by 352
  7. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
  8. 2018Learning to Adapt in Dynamic, Real-World Environments Through Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 270
  9. 2020ThreeDWorld: A Platform for Interactive Multi-Modal Physical Simulationcited by 249
  10. 2020ObjectNav Revisited: On Evaluation of Embodied Agents Navigating to Objectscited by 240
  11. 2020Learning Agile Robotic Locomotion Skills by Imitating Animalscited by 229
  12. 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
  13. 2014Robots that can adapt like animalscited by 203
  14. 2021TEACh: Task-driven Embodied Agents that Chatcited by 194
  15. 2021iGibson 2.0: Object-Centric Simulation for Robot Learning of Everyday Household Taskscited by 191
  16. 2021Simple but Effective: CLIP Embeddings for Embodied AIcited by 191
  17. 2020RoboTHOR: An Open Simulation-to-Real Embodied AI Platformcited by 190
  18. 2020Rearrangement: A Challenge for Embodied AIcited by 153
  19. 2022Legged Locomotion in Challenging Terrains using Egocentric Visioncited by 131
  20. 2017Preparing for the Unknown: Learning a Universal Policy with Online System Identificationcited by 129
  21. 2018Meta-Reinforcement Learning of Structured Exploration Strategiescited by 128
  22. 2021Visual Room Rearrangementcited by 101
  23. 2021ManipulaTHOR: A Framework for Visual Object Manipulationcited by 101
  24. 2021Learning High-Speed Flight in the Wildcited by 98
  25. 2020MultiON: Benchmarking Semantic Map Memory using Multi-Object Navigationcited by 95
  26. 2018Learning to Learn How to Learn: Self-Adaptive Visual Navigation Using Meta-Learningcited by 91
  27. 2019Interactive Gibson Benchmark (iGibson 0.5): A Benchmark for Interactive Navigation in Cluttered Environmentscited by 89
  28. 2022Neural-Fly Enables Rapid Learning for Agile Flight in Strong Windscited by 80
  29. 2021The ThreeDWorld Transport Challenge: A Visually Guided Task-and-Motion Planning Benchmark for Physically Realistic Embodied AIcited by 64
  30. 2018Neural Task Graphs: Generalizing to Unseen Tasks from a Single Video Demonstrationcited by 60
  31. 2020AllenAct: A Framework for Embodied AI Researchcited by 54
  32. 2021RobustNav: Towards Benchmarking Robustness in Embodied Navigationcited by 52
  33. 2019Learning Fast Adaptation with Meta Strategy Optimizationcited by 46
  34. 2019Two Body Problem: Collaborative Visual Task Completioncited by 45
  35. 2020Rapidly Adaptable Legged Robots via Evolutionary Meta-Learningcited by 42
  36. 2018Policy Transfer with Strategy Optimizationcited by 41
  37. 2019Environment Probing Interaction Policiescited by 39
  38. 2022Adapting Rapid Motor Adaptation for Bipedal Robotscited by 39

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.