mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting Simple Regret: Fast Rates for Returning a Good Arm

arXiv 2210.16913 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Simple regret is a natural and parameter-free performance criterion for pure exploration in multi-armed bandits yet is less popular than the probability of missing the best arm or an ε-good arm, perhaps due to lack of easy ways to characterize it. In this paper, we make significant progress on minimizing simple regret in both data-rich (T≥ n) and data-poor regime (T ≤ n) where n is the number of arms, and T is the number of samples. At its heart is our improved instance-dependent analysis of the well-known Sequential Halving (SH) algorithm, where we bound the probability of returning an arm whose mean reward is not within ε from the best (i.e., not ε-good) for textitany choice of ε>0, although ε is not an input to SH. Our bound not only leads to an optimal worst-case simple regret bound of √n/T up to logarithmic factors but also essentially matches the instance-dependent lower bound for returning an ε-good arm reported by Katz-Samuels and Jamieson (2020). For the more challenging data-poor regime, we propose Bracketing SH (BSH) that enjoys the same improvement even without sampling each arm at least once. Our empirical study shows that BSH outperforms existing methods on real-world tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2022.

Builds on

27 of 50 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
  2. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
  3. 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
  4. 2018A System for Massively Parallel Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 201
  5. 2017Unifying PAC and Regret: Uniform PAC Bounds for Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 175
  6. 2013lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 148
  7. 2016Coin Betting and Parameter-Free Online Learningcited by 131
  8. 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 100
  9. 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 98
  10. 2016Tight (Lower) Bounds for the Fixed Budget Best Arm Identification Bandit Problemcited by 79
  11. 2020Adaptive Reward-Free Explorationcited by 77
  12. 2019Pure Exploration with Multiple Correct Answerscited by 60
15 more
  1. 2021High-Dimensional Experimental Design and Kernel Banditscited by 55
  2. 2015Simple regret for infinitely many armed banditscited by 39
  3. 2019The True Sample Complexity of Identifying Good Armscited by 37
  4. 2017The Simulator: Understanding Adaptive Sampling in the Moderate-Confidence Regimecited by 31
  5. 2016Towards Instance Optimal Bounds for Best Arm Identificationcited by 30
  6. 2017Nearly Instance Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Top-k Arm Selectioncited by 28
  7. 2022PopArt: Efficient Sparse Regression and Experimental Design for Optimal Sparse Linear Banditscited by 17
  8. 2021Bandits with many optimal armscited by 16
  9. 2018Pure Exploration in Infinitely-Armed Bandit Models with Fixed-Confidencecited by 15
  10. 2019PAC Identification of Many Good Arms in Stochastic Multi-Armed Banditscited by 15
  11. 2020An Optimal Elimination Algorithm for Learning a Best Armcited by 10
  12. 2013On Finding the Largest Mean Among Manycited by 9
  13. 2019Ultra Fast Medoid Identification via Correlated Sequential Halvingcited by 9
  14. 2020Crush Optimism with Pessimism: Structured Bandits Beyond Asymptotic Optimalitycited by 7
  15. 2021Near Instance Optimal Model Selection for Pure Exploration Linear Banditscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 10; 2026: 8.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Noise-Adaptive Confidence Sets for Linear Bandits and Application to Bayesian Optimizationcited by 6
  2. 2024Best Arm Identification with Minimal Regretcited by 5
  3. 2026Multi-Drafter Speculative Decoding with Alignment Feedbackcited by 3
  4. 2024A Bandit Approach with Evolutionary Operators for Model Selectioncited by 2
  5. 2024Fixing the Loose Brake: Exponential-Tailed Stopping Time in Best Arm Identificationcited by 2
  6. 2025Evolution of Information in Interactive Decision Making: A Case Study for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 2
  7. 2025Clustering Items through Bandit Feedback: Finding the Right Feature out of Manycited by 2
  8. 2025Graph Learning Is Suboptimal in Causal Banditscited by 2
  9. 2023Best Arm Identification in Batched Multi-armed Bandit Problemscited by 1
  10. 2024A Batch Sequential Halving Algorithm without Performance Degradationcited by 1
  11. 2025Multi-thresholding Good Arm Identification with Bandit Feedbackcited by 1
  12. 2025Balancing Performance and Costs in Best Arm Identificationcited by 1
13 more
  1. 2025Multi-Metric Adaptive Experimental Design Under a Fixed Budget with Validationcited by 1
  2. 2025Near Optimal Non-asymptotic Sample Complexity of 1-Identificationcited by 1
  3. 2025Last-Iterate Analyses of FTRL with the 1/2-Tsallis Entropy in Stochastic Banditscited by 1
  4. 2024Fixed Confidence Best Arm Identification in the Bayesian Settingcited by 0
  5. 2025On the Problem of Best Arm Retentioncited by 0
  6. 2025Top-k Feature Importance Rankingcited by 0
  7. 2026Neural Nonmyopic Bayesian Optimization in Dynamic Cost Settingscited by 0
  8. 2026Fixed Budget is No Harder Than Fixed Confidence in Best-Arm Identification up to Logarithmic Factorscited by 0
  9. 2026Box Thirding: Anytime Best Arm Identification under Insufficient Samplingcited by 0
  10. 2026varepsilon-Good Action Identification in Fixed-Budget Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 0
  11. 2026Active Context Selection Improves Simple Regret in Contextual Banditscited by 0
  12. 2026MESHA: Mechanism-Enforced Sequential Halving for Strategic Linear Banditscited by 0
  13. 2026Does 1/2-Tsallis-INF Also Work Well for Best-Arm Identification?cited by 0