mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fixing the Loose Brake: Exponential-Tailed Stopping Time in Best Arm Identification

arXiv 2411.01808 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The best arm identification problem requires identifying the best alternative (i.e., arm) in active experimentation using the smallest number of experiments (i.e., arm pulls), which is crucial for cost-efficient and timely decision-making processes. In the fixed confidence setting, an algorithm must stop data-dependently and return the estimated best arm with a correctness guarantee. Since this stopping time is random, we desire its distribution to have light tails. Unfortunately, many existing studies focus on high probability or in expectation bounds on the stopping time, which allow heavy tails and, for high probability bounds, even not stopping at all. We first prove that this never-stopping event can indeed happen for some popular algorithms. Motivated by this, we propose algorithms that provably enjoy an exponential-tailed stopping time, which improves upon the polynomial tail bound reported by Kalyanakrishnan et al. (2012). The first algorithm is based on a fixed budget algorithm called Sequential Halving along with a doubling trick. The second algorithm is a meta algorithm that takes in any fixed confidence algorithm with a high probability stopping guarantee and turns it into one that enjoys an exponential-tailed stopping time. Our results imply that there is much more to be desired for contemporary fixed confidence algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.

Builds on

10 of 24 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
  2. 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
  3. 2013lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 148
  4. 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 113
  5. 2017Improving the Expected Improvement Algorithmcited by 54
  6. 2019Fixed-Confidence Guarantees for Bayesian Best-Arm Identificationcited by 38
  7. 2022Top Two Algorithms Revisitedcited by 34
  8. 2016Towards Instance Optimal Bounds for Best Arm Identificationcited by 30
  9. 2022Revisiting Simple Regret: Fast Rates for Returning a Good Armcited by 25
  10. 2022Non-Asymptotic Analysis of a UCB-based Top Two Algorithmcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.