mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Crush Optimism with Pessimism: Structured Bandits Beyond Asymptotic Optimality

arXiv 2006.08754 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study stochastic structured bandits for minimizing regret. The fact that the popular optimistic algorithms do not achieve the asymptotic instance-dependent regret optimality (asymptotic optimality for short) has recently alluded researchers. On the other hand, it is known that one can achieve bounded regret (i.e., does not grow indefinitely with n) in certain instances. Unfortunately, existing asymptotically optimal algorithms rely on forced sampling that introduces an ω(1) term w.r.t. the time horizon n in their regret, failing to adapt to the "easiness" of the instance. In this paper, we focus on the finite hypothesis case and ask if one can achieve the asymptotic optimality while enjoying bounded regret whenever possible. We provide a positive answer by introducing a new algorithm called CRush Optimism with Pessimism (CROP) that eliminates optimistic hypotheses by pulling the informative arms indicated by a pessimistic hypothesis. Our finite-time analysis shows that CROP (i) achieves a constant-factor asymptotic optimality and, thanks to the forced-exploration-free design, (ii) adapts to bounded regret, and (iii) its regret bound scales not with K but with an effective number of arms K_psi that we introduce. We also discuss a problem class where CROP can be exponentially better than existing algorithms in textitnonasymptotic regimes. This problem class also reveals a surprising fact that even a clairvoyant oracle who plays according to the asymptotically optimal arm pull scheme may suffer a linear worst-case regret.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.