mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Noise-Adaptive Confidence Sets for Linear Bandits and Application to Bayesian Optimization

arXiv 2402.07341 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adapting to a priori unknown noise level is a very important but challenging problem in sequential decision-making as efficient exploration typically requires knowledge of the noise level, which is often loosely specified. We report significant progress in addressing this issue for linear bandits in two respects. First, we propose a novel confidence set that is `semi-adaptive' to the unknown sub-Gaussian parameter σ_*2 in the sense that the (normalized) confidence width scales with √dσ_*2 + σ02 where d is the dimension and σ02 is the specified sub-Gaussian parameter (known) that can be much larger than σ_*2. This is a significant improvement over √dσ02 of the standard confidence set of Abbasi-Yadkori et al. (2011), especially when d is large or σ_*2=0. We show that this leads to an improved regret bound in linear bandits. Second, for bounded rewards, we propose a novel variance-adaptive confidence set that has much improved numerical performance upon prior art. We then apply this confidence set to develop, as we claim, the first practical variance-adaptive linear bandit algorithm via an optimistic approach, which is enabled by our novel regret analysis technique. Both of our confidence sets rely critically on `regret equality' from online learning. Our empirical evaluation in diverse Bayesian optimization tasks shows that our proposed algorithms demonstrate better or comparable performance compared to existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

21 of 45 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
  2. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processescited by 199
  3. 2020NATS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Architecture Topology and Sizecited by 98
  4. 2020Logarithmic Regret for Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 79
  5. 2018Information Directed Sampling and Bandits with Heteroscedastic Noisecited by 75
  6. 2017Dealing with Integer-valued Variables in Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 65
  7. 2017Scalable Generalized Linear Bandits: Online Computation and Hashingcited by 63
  8. 2022Computationally Efficient Horizon-Free Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture MDPscited by 52
  9. 2021Improved Regret Analysis for Variance-Adaptive Linear Bandits and Horizon-Free Linear Mixture MDPscited by 44
  10. 2021Tight Concentrations and Confidence Sequences from the Regret of Universal Portfoliocited by 42
  11. 2023Variance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Linear Bandits and Reinforcement Learning: Adaptivity and Computational Efficiencycited by 39
  12. 2015On Equivalence of Martingale Tail Bounds and Deterministic Regret Inequalitiescited by 27
9 more
  1. 2015Online Stochastic Linear Optimization under One-bit Feedbackcited by 26
  2. 2021Stochastic Bandits for Multi-platform Budget Optimization in Online Advertisingcited by 25
  3. 2022Revisiting Simple Regret: Fast Rates for Returning a Good Armcited by 25
  4. 2023Improved Regret Bounds of (Multinomial) Logistic Bandits via Regret-to-Confidence-Set Conversioncited by 24
  5. 2022Bregman Deviations of Generic Exponential Familiescited by 13
  6. 2022Scale-free Unconstrained Online Learning for Curved Lossescited by 13
  7. 2022Norm-Agnostic Linear Banditscited by 12
  8. 2023Improved Algorithms for Stochastic Linear Bandits Using Tail Bounds for Martingale Mixturescited by 12
  9. 2023Likelihood Ratio Confidence Sets for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.