mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAC Identification of Many Good Arms in Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits

arXiv 1901.08386 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of identifying any k out of the best m arms in an n-armed stochastic multi-armed bandit. Framed in the PAC setting, this particular problem generalises both the problem of `best subset selection' and that of selecting `one out of the best m' arms [arcsk 2017]. In applications such as crowd-sourcing and drug-designing, identifying a single good solution is often not sufficient. Moreover, finding the best subset might be hard due to the presence of many indistinguishably close solutions. Our generalisation of identifying exactly k arms out of the best m, where 1 ≤ k ≤ m, serves as a more effective alternative. We present a lower bound on the worst-case sample complexity for general k, and a fully sequential PAC algorithm, GLUCB, which is more sample-efficient on easy instances. Also, extending our analysis to infinite-armed bandits, we present a PAC algorithm that is independent of n, which identifies an arm from the best ρ fraction of arms using at most an additive poly-log number of samples than compared to the lower bound, thereby improving over [arcsk 2017] and [Aziz+AKA:2018]. The problem of identifying k > 1 distinct arms from the best ρ fraction is not always well-defined; for a special class of this problem, we present lower and upper bounds. Finally, through a reduction, we establish a relation between upper bounds for the `one out of the best ρ' problem for infinite instances and the `one out of the best m' problem for finite instances. We conjecture that it is more efficient to solve `small' finite instances using the latter formulation, rather than going through the former.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort: