mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on Optimizing OneMax with the (1+(λ,λ))-GA

arXiv 2512.03805 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations

Abstract (arXiv)

Dynamic Algorithm Configuration (DAC) studies the efficient identification of control policies for parameterized optimization algorithms. Numerous studies leverage Reinforcement Learning (RL) to address DAC challenges; however, applying RL often requires extensive domain expertise. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive study of two deep-RL algorithms--Double Deep Q-Networks (DDQN) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)--for controlling the population size of the (1+(λ,λ))-GA on OneMax instances. Although OneMax is structurally simple, learning effective control policies for the (1+(λ,λ))-GA induces a highly challenging DAC landscape, making it a controlled yet demanding benchmark. Our investigation reveals two fundamental challenges limiting DDQN and PPO: scalability degradation and learning instability, traced to under-exploration and planning horizon coverage. To address under-exploration, we introduce an adaptive reward shifting mechanism that leverages reward distribution statistics to enhance DDQN exploration. This eliminates instance-specific hyperparameter tuning and ensures consistent effectiveness across problem scales. To resolve planning horizon coverage, we demonstrate that undiscounted learning succeeds in DDQN, while PPO faces fundamental variance issues necessitating alternative designs. We further show that while hyperparameter optimization enhances PPO's stability, it consistently fails to identify effective policies. Finally, DDQN with adaptive reward shifting achieves performance comparable to theoretically derived policies with vastly improved sample efficiency, outperforming prior DAC approaches by orders of magnitude. Our findings provide insights into the fundamental obstacles faced by standard deep-RL approaches in this challenging DAC setting and highlight the key methodological ingredients required for effective learning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 46 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2025.

Builds on

46 of 95 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+(λ,λ))-GA27 Feb
  2. 2024A Method for Evaluating Hyperparameter Sensitivity in Reinforcement Learning10 Dec
  3. 2024ARLBench: Flexible and Efficient Benchmarking for Hyperparameter Optimization in Reinforcement Learning27 Sep
  4. 2024Instance Selection for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration with Reinforcement Learning: Improving Generalization18 Jul
  5. 2024Potential-Based Reward Shaping For Intrinsic Motivation12 Feb

Other references · 41

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  5. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  6. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  7. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  8. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,240
  9. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
  10. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
  11. 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 639
  12. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
29 more
  1. 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 470
  2. 2018Large-Scale Study of Curiosity-Driven Learningcited by 280
  3. 2021SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 230
  4. 2015Contextual Markov Decision Processescited by 220
  5. 2018Understanding the impact of entropy on policy optimizationcited by 176
  6. 2020What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 162
  7. 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPOcited by 112
  8. 2014ParamILS: An Automatic Algorithm Configuration Frameworkcited by 89
  9. 2016Learning values across many orders of magnitudecited by 85
  10. 2022Automated Reinforcement Learning (AutoRL): A Survey and Open Problemscited by 70
  11. 2023Hyperparameters in Reinforcement Learning and How To Tune Themcited by 59
  12. 2023Empirical Design in Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
  13. 2020Discount Factor as a Regularizer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
  14. 2022Automated Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 39
  15. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Parameter Control in Differential Evolutioncited by 38
  16. 2022A Survey of Methods for Automated Algorithm Configurationcited by 30
  17. 2024A Large Language Model-Driven Reward Design Framework via Dynamic Feedback for Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  18. 2021DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 28
  19. 2018DORA The Explorer: Directed Outreaching Reinforcement Action-Selectioncited by 27
  20. 2025Reinforcement Learning-based Self-adaptive Differential Evolution through Automated Landscape Feature Learningcited by 12
  21. 2019Online Selection of CMA-ES Variantscited by 11
  22. 2022Theory-inspired Parameter Control Benchmarks for Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 11
  23. 2023Reward Scale Robustness for Proximal Policy Optimization via DreamerV3 Trickscited by 7
  24. 2025Surrogate Learning in Meta-Black-Box Optimization: A Preliminary Studycited by 7
  25. 2015Optimal Parameter Choices Through Self-Adjustment: Applying the 1/5-th Rule in Discrete Settingscited by 5
  26. 2023Using Automated Algorithm Configuration for Parameter Controlcited by 5
  27. 2022Challenges to Solving Combinatorially Hard Long-Horizon Deep RL Taskscited by 4
  28. 2024CANDID DAC: Leveraging Coupled Action Dimensions with Importance Differences in DACcited by 4
  29. 2025Enhancing Parameter Control Policies with State Informationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Multi-parameter Control for the (1+(λ,λ))-GA on OneMax via Deep Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Selection: A Proof-of-Principle Study on Differential Evolution
  3. 2024Efficient Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Novel Bayesian Actor-Critic Algorithm
  4. 2025A Practical Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026When does learning pay off? A study on DRL-based dynamic algorithm configuration for carbon-aware scheduling
  6. 2025β-DQN: Improving Deep Q-Learning By Evolving the Behavior
  7. 2025An Integrated Approach to Neural Architecture Search for Deep Q-Networks
  8. 2025Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization