Instance Selection for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration with Reinforcement Learning: Improving Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dynamic Algorithm Configuration (DAC) addresses the challenge of dynamically setting hyperparameters of an algorithm for a diverse set of instances rather than focusing solely on individual tasks. Agents trained with Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) offer a pathway to solve such settings. However, the limited generalization performance of these agents has significantly hindered the application in DAC. Our hypothesis is that a potential bias in the training instances limits generalization capabilities. We take a step towards mitigating this by selecting a representative subset of training instances to overcome overrepresentation and then retraining the agent on this subset to improve its generalization performance. For constructing the meta-features for the subset selection, we particularly account for the dynamic nature of the RL agent by computing time series features on trajectories of actions and rewards generated by the agent's interaction with the environment. Through empirical evaluations on the Sigmoid and CMA-ES benchmarks from the standard benchmark library for DAC, called DACBench, we discuss the potentials of our selection technique compared to training on the entire instance set. Our results highlight the efficacy of instance selection in refining DAC policies for diverse instance spaces.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.
Builds on
10 of 19 references.
References · 10
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
- 2018A Study on Overfitting in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 170
- 2021A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 164
- 2016COCO: A Platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a Black-Box Settingcited by 135
- 2019catch22: CAnonical Time-series CHaracteristicscited by 103
- 2018Illuminating Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning through Procedural Level Generationcited by 80
- 2022Automated Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 37
- 2015ASlib: A Benchmark Library for Algorithm Selectioncited by 36
- 2021DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+(λ,λ))-GAcited by 5
- 2024ARLBench: Flexible and Efficient Benchmarking for Hyperparameter Optimization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2025Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on Optimizing OneMax with the (1+(λ,λ))-GAcited by 1
- 2025OPAL: Operator-Programmed Algorithms for Landscape-Aware Black-Box Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Integrating Fairness and Explainability in a Multiple Instance Reinforcement Learning Systemcited by 0
- 2026Integrating Fairness and Explainability in a Multiple Instance Reinforcement Learning System2 Sep 2026
- 2025OPAL: Operator-Programmed Algorithms for Landscape-Aware Black-Box Optimization14 Dec 2025
- 2025Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on Optimizing OneMax with the (1+(λ,λ))-GA3 Dec 2025
- 2025On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+(λ,λ))-GA27 Feb 2025
- 2024ARLBench: Flexible and Efficient Benchmarking for Hyperparameter Optimization in Reinforcement Learning27 Sep 2024