CANDID DAC: Leveraging Coupled Action Dimensions with Importance Differences in DAC
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-dimensional action spaces remain a challenge for dynamic algorithm configuration (DAC). Interdependencies and varying importance between action dimensions are further known key characteristics of DAC problems. We argue that these Coupled Action Dimensions with Importance Differences (CANDID) represent aspects of the DAC problem that are not yet fully explored. To address this gap, we introduce a new white-box benchmark within the DACBench suite that simulates the properties of CANDID. Further, we propose sequential policies as an effective strategy for managing these properties. Such policies factorize the action space and mitigate exponential growth by learning a policy per action dimension. At the same time, these policies accommodate the interdependence of action dimensions by fostering implicit coordination. We show this in an experimental study of value-based policies on our new benchmark. This study demonstrates that sequential policies significantly outperform independent learning of factorized policies in CANDID action spaces. In addition, they overcome the scalability limitations associated with learning a single policy across all action dimensions. The code used for our experiments is available under https://github.com/PhilippBordne/candidDAC.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2024.
Builds on
14 of 35 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
- 2015Multiagent Cooperation and Competition with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 184
- 2020One Policy to Control Them All: Shared Modular Policies for Agent-Agnostic Controlcited by 121
- 2017Hyperparameter Importance Across Datasetscited by 63
- 2017Discrete Sequential Prediction of Continuous Actions for Deep RLcited by 51
- 2022Automated Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 39
- 2021Explaining Hyperparameter Optimization via Partial Dependence Plotscited by 35
- 2023Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 33
- 2021DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 28
- 2017Learning to Factor Policies and Action-Value Functions: Factored Action Space Representations for Deep Reinforcement learningcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+(λ,λ))-GAcited by 5
- 2025Sequential Multi-Agent Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 3
- 2025Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on Optimizing OneMax with the (1+(λ,λ))-GAcited by 1
- 2026Contextual Intelligence The Next Leap for Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Contextual Intelligence The Next Leap for Reinforcement Learning17 Feb 2026
- 2025Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on Optimizing OneMax with the (1+(λ,λ))-GA3 Dec 2025
- 2025Sequential Multi-Agent Dynamic Algorithm Configuration27 Oct 2025
- 2025On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+(λ,λ))-GA27 Feb 2025