mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-parameter Control for the (1+(λ,λ))-GA on OneMax via Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2505.12982 ↗First posted 19 May 2025cs.LG cs.NEcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for games and combinatorial optimization

Abstract (arXiv)

It is well known that evolutionary algorithms can benefit from dynamic choices of the key parameters that control their behavior, to adjust their search strategy to the different stages of the optimization process. A prominent example where dynamic parameter choices have shown a provable super-constant speed-up is the (1+(λ,λ)) Genetic Algorithm optimizing the OneMax function. While optimal parameter control policies result in linear expected running times, this is not possible with static parameter choices. This result has spurred a lot of interest in parameter control policies. However, many works, in particular theoretical running time analyses, focus on controlling one single parameter. Deriving policies for controlling multiple parameters remains very challenging. In this work we reconsider the problem of the (1+(λ,λ)) Genetic Algorithm optimizing OneMax. We decouple its four main parameters and investigate how well state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning techniques can approximate good control policies. We show that although making deep reinforcement learning learn effectively is a challenging task, once it works, it is very powerful and is able to find policies that outperform all previously known control policies on the same benchmark. Based on the results found through reinforcement learning, we derive a simple control policy that consistently outperforms the default theory-recommended setting by 27% and the irace-tuned policy, the strongest existing control policy on this benchmark, by 13%, for all tested problem sizes up to 40,000.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for games and combinatorial optimization, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 28 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

Builds on

28 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Auto-configuring Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff in Evolutionary Computation via Deep Reinforcement Learning12 Apr

Other references · 27

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  5. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  6. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  7. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 754
  8. 2019Challenges of Real-World Reinforcement Learningcited by 291
  9. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning in Large Discrete Action Spacescited by 161
  10. 2017Reproducibility of Benchmarked Deep Reinforcement Learning Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 93
  11. 2017Action Branching Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
  12. 2018Learn What Not to Learn: Action Elimination with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 77
15 more
  1. 2022Automated Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 39
  2. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Parameter Control in Differential Evolutioncited by 38
  3. 2022Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 36
  4. 2020Learning Heuristic Selection with Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 21
  5. 2019Self-Adjusting Mutation Rates with Provably Optimal Success Rulescited by 13
  6. 2021Lazy Parameter Tuning and Control: Choosing All Parameters Randomly From a Power-Law Distributioncited by 11
  7. 2022Theory-inspired Parameter Control Benchmarks for Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 11
  8. 2018Theory of Parameter Control for Discrete Black-Box Optimization: Provable Performance Gains Through Dynamic Parameter Choicescited by 9
  9. 2017Runtime Analysis of the (1+(λ,λ)) Genetic Algorithm on Random Satisfiable 3-CNF Formulascited by 7
  10. 2022Reinforcement learning based adaptive metaheuristicscited by 7
  11. 2015Optimal Parameter Choices Through Self-Adjustment: Applying the 1/5-th Rule in Discrete Settingscited by 5
  12. 2023Using Automated Algorithm Configuration for Parameter Controlcited by 5
  13. 2025On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+(λ,λ))-GAcited by 5
  14. 2019Hyper-Parameter Tuning for the (1+(λ,λ)) GAcited by 4
  15. 2024Empirical Analysis of the Dynamic Binary Value Problem with IOHprofilercited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on Optimizing OneMax with the (1+(λ,λ))-GA
  2. 2026Decoupling Numerical and Structural Parameters: An Empirical Study on Adaptive Genetic Algorithms via Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Large-Scale TSP
  3. 2025Synergizing Reinforcement Learning and Genetic Algorithms for Neural Combinatorial Optimization
  4. 2024Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Selection: A Proof-of-Principle Study on Differential Evolution
  5. 2026Parameter Exploration for RLVR via Variational Learning
  6. 2024Combining Automated Optimisation of Hyperparameters and Reward Shape
  7. 2026Detect and Act: Automated Dynamic Optimizer through Meta-Black-Box Optimization
  8. 2025HypeRL: Hypernetwork-Based Reinforcement Learning for Control of Parametrized Dynamical Systems