Optimal Parameter Choices Through Self-Adjustment: Applying the 1/5-th Rule in Discrete Settings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While evolutionary algorithms are known to be very successful for a broad range of applications, the algorithm designer is often left with many algorithmic choices, for example, the size of the population, the mutation rates, and the crossover rates of the algorithm. These parameters are known to have a crucial influence on the optimization time, and thus need to be chosen carefully, a task that often requires substantial efforts. Moreover, the optimal parameters can change during the optimization process. It is therefore of great interest to design mechanisms that dynamically choose best-possible parameters. An example for such an update mechanism is the one-fifth success rule for step-size adaption in evolutionary strategies. While in continuous domains this principle is well understood also from a mathematical point of view, no comparable theory is available for problems in discrete domains. In this work we show that the one-fifth success rule can be effective also in discrete settings. We regard the (1+(λ,λ))~GA proposed in [Doerr/Doerr/Ebel: From black-box complexity to designing new genetic algorithms, TCS 2015]. We prove that if its population size is chosen according to the one-fifth success rule then the expected optimization time on textscOneMax is linear. This is better than what any static population size λ can achieve and is asymptotically optimal also among all adaptive parameter choices.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+(λ,λ))-GAcited by 5
- 2025Multi-parameter Control for the (1+(λ,λ))-GA on OneMax via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on Optimizing OneMax with the (1+(λ,λ))-GAcited by 1
- 2021Frequency Fitness Assignment: Optimization without Bias for Good Solutions can be Efficientcited by 0
- 2026Selection Hyper-heuristics Can Automatically Adjust the Learning Period to Optimally Solve Pseudo-Boolean Problemscited by 0
- 2026Selection Hyper-heuristics Can Automatically Adjust the Learning Period to Optimally Solve Pseudo-Boolean Problems28 May 2026
- 2025Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on Optimizing OneMax with the (1+(λ,λ))-GA3 Dec 2025
- 2025Multi-parameter Control for the (1+(λ,λ))-GA on OneMax via Deep Reinforcement Learning19 May 2025
- 2025On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+(λ,λ))-GA27 Feb 2025
- 2021Frequency Fitness Assignment: Optimization without Bias for Good Solutions can be Efficient1 Dec 2021