mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Parameter Control in Differential Evolution

arXiv 1905.08006 ↗First posted 20 May 2019cs.NEcited by 37

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adaptive Operator Selection (AOS) is an approach that controls discrete parameters of an Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) during the run. In this paper, we propose an AOS method based on Double Deep Q-Learning (DDQN), a Deep Reinforcement Learning method, to control the mutation strategies of Differential Evolution (DE). The application of DDQN to DE requires two phases. First, a neural network is trained offline by collecting data about the DE state and the benefit (reward) of applying each mutation strategy during multiple runs of DE tackling benchmark functions. We define the DE state as the combination of 99 different features and we analyze three alternative reward functions. Second, when DDQN is applied as a parameter controller within DE to a different test set of benchmark functions, DDQN uses the trained neural network to predict which mutation strategy should be applied to each parent at each generation according to the DE state. Benchmark functions for training and testing are taken from the CEC2005 benchmark with dimensions 10 and 30. We compare the results of the proposed DE-DDQN algorithm to several baseline DE algorithms using no online selection, random selection and other AOS methods, and also to the two winners of the CEC2005 competition. The results show that DE-DDQN outperforms the non-adaptive methods for all functions in the test set; while its results are comparable with the last two algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 37 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 9; 2025: 13; 2026: 5.

37 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Automated Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 37
  2. 2022Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 36
  3. 2023MetaBox: A Benchmark Platform for Meta-Black-Box Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  4. 2024Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Selection: A Proof-of-Principle Study on Differential Evolutioncited by 24
  5. 2024Bridging Evolutionary Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Survey on Hybrid Algorithmscited by 23
  6. 2024Toward Automated Algorithm Design: A Survey and Practical Guide to Meta-Black-Box-Optimizationcited by 23
  7. 2024Symbol: Generating Flexible Black-Box Optimizers through Symbolic Equation Learningcited by 22
  8. 2024Auto-configuring Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff in Evolutionary Computation via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  9. 2024ConfigX: Modular Configuration for Evolutionary Algorithms via Multitask Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  10. 2023Automated Design of Metaheuristic Algorithms: A Surveycited by 12
  11. 2025Reinforcement Learning-based Self-adaptive Differential Evolution through Automated Landscape Feature Learningcited by 12
  12. 2022Theory-inspired Parameter Control Benchmarks for Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 11
25 more
  1. 2024Neural Exploratory Landscape Analysis for Meta-Black-Box-Optimizationcited by 10
  2. 2025MetaBox-v2: A Unified Benchmark Platform for Meta-Black-Box Optimizationcited by 9
  3. 2025A Systematic Survey on Large Language Models for Evolutionary Optimization: From Modeling to Solvingcited by 9
  4. 2022Reinforcement learning based adaptive metaheuristicscited by 7
  5. 2024RLEMMO: Evolutionary Multimodal Optimization Assisted By Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  6. 2025Surrogate Learning in Meta-Black-Box Optimization: A Preliminary Studycited by 7
  7. 2025Instance Generation for Meta-Black-Box Optimization through Latent Space Reverse Engineeringcited by 6
  8. 2023Using Automated Algorithm Configuration for Parameter Controlcited by 5
  9. 2025On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+(λ,λ))-GAcited by 5
  10. 2025DesignX: Human-Competitive Algorithm Designer for Black-Box Optimizationcited by 5
  11. 2025Advancing CMA-ES with Learning-Based Cooperative Coevolution for Scalable Optimizationcited by 4
  12. 2024R2 Indicator and Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Adaptive Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithmcited by 3
  13. 2025LiBOG: Lifelong Learning for Black-Box Optimizer Generationcited by 3
  14. 2025Multi-parameter Control for the (1+(λ,λ))-GA on OneMax via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  15. 2025Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on Optimizing OneMax with the (1+(λ,λ))-GAcited by 1
  16. 2026Meta-Black-Box Optimization with Ensemble Surrogate Modeling for Robustness-Accuracy Trade-off within SAEAcited by 1
  17. 2022Learning Adaptive Evolutionary Computation for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization Problemscited by 0
  18. 2023Local Optima Correlation Assisted Adaptive Operator Selectioncited by 0
  19. 2023UAV Trajectory and Multi-User Beamforming Optimization for Clustered Users Against Passive Eavesdropping Attacks With Unknown CSIcited by 0
  20. 2025Reinforcement learning Based Automated Design of Differential Evolution Algorithm for Black-box Optimizationcited by 0
  21. 2025Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 0
  22. 2026READY: Reward Discovery for Meta-Black-Box Optimizationcited by 0
  23. 2026Surrogate Ensemble in Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization via Deep Q-Learningcited by 0
  24. 2026Code World Models for Parameter Control in Evolutionary Algorithmscited by 0
  25. 2026Discovering Interpretable Multi-Parameter Control Policies for Evolutionary Algorithms Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0